ArticleScientific reports2019
Comprehensive biodiversity analysis via ultra-deep patterned flow cell technology: a case study of eDNA metabarcoding seawater.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Integrated Reanalysis of Global Riverine Fish eDNA Datasets Shows Robustness and Congruence of Biodiversity Conclusions.Molecular ecology · 2026Pooled it
- Transforming gastrointestinal helminth parasite identification in vertebrate hosts with metabarcoding: a systematic review.Parasites & vectors · 2024Pooled it
- Unveiling the terra cognita of sequence spaces using Cartesian projection of asymmetric distances.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Metatranscriptomics-based metabolic modeling of patient-specific urinary microbiome during infection.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Taxonomic Diversity and Clinical Correlations in Periapical Lesions by Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis.Genes · 2025Article
- The Long and the Short of It: Nanopore-Based eDNA Metabarcoding of Marine Vertebrates Works; Sensitivity and Species-Level Assignment Depend on Amplicon Lengths.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Environment DNA Reveals Fish Diversity in a Canyon River within the Upper Pearl River Drainage.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- A pile of pipelines: An overview of the bioinformatics software for metabarcoding data analyses.Molecular ecology resources · 2024Review
- Analysing the effects of distance, taxon and biomass on vertebrate detections using bulk-collected carrion fly iDNA.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of the performance of MiSeq and NovaSeq in oral microbiome study.Journal of oral microbiology · 2024Article
- Mock community experiments can inform on the reliability of eDNA metabarcoding data: a case study on marine phytoplankton.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Investigations of Fish Assemblages Using Two Methods in Three Terminal Reservoirs of the East Route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project, China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Otterly delicious: Spatiotemporal variation in the diet of a recovering population of Eurasian otters (Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Screening Salamanders for Symbionts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.PloS one · 2023Article
- COI metabarcoding of large benthic Foraminifera: Method validation for application in ecological studies.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Non-Invasive Fetal K Status Prediction: 7 Years of Experience.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022Article
- Toward global integration of biodiversity big data: a harmonized metabarcode data generation module for terrestrial arthropods.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Applying convolutional neural networks to speed up environmental DNA annotation in a highly diverse ecosystem.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The characterization of biodiversity is a crucial element of ecological investigations as well as environmental assessment and monitoring activities. Increasingly, amplicon-based environmental DNA metabarcoding (alternatively, marker gene metagenomics) is used for such studies given its ability to provide biodiversity data from various groups of organisms simply from analysis of bulk environmental samples such as water, soil or sediments. The Illumina MiSeq is currently the most popular tool for carrying out this work, but we set out to determine whether typical studies were reading enough DNA to detect rare organisms (i.e., those that may be of greatest interest such as endangered or invasive species) present in the environment. We collected sea water samples along two transects in Conception Bay, Newfoundland and analyzed them on the MiSeq with a sequencing depth of 100,000 reads per sample (exceeding the 60,000 per sample that is typical of similar studies). We then analyzed these same samples on Illumina's newest high-capacity platform, the NovaSeq, at a depth of 7 million reads per sample. Not surprisingly, the NovaSeq detected many more taxa than the MiSeq thanks to its much greater sequencing depth. However, contrary to our expectations this pattern was true even in depth-for-depth comparisons. In other words, the NovaSeq can detect more DNA sequence diversity within samples than the MiSeq, even at the exact same sequencing depth. Even when samples were reanalyzed on the MiSeq with a sequencing depth of 1 million reads each, the MiSeq's ability to detect new sequences plateaued while the NovaSeq continued to detect new sequence variants. These results have important biological implications. The NovaSeq found 40% more metazoan families in this environment than the MiSeq, including some of interest such as marine mammals and bony fish so the real-world implications of these findings are significant. These results are most likely associated to the advances incorporated in the NovaSeq, especially a patterned flow cell, which prevents similar sequences that are neighbours on the flow cell (common in metabarcoding studies) from being erroneously merged into single spots by the sequencing instrument. This study sets the stage for incorporating eDNA metabarcoding in comprehensive analysis of oceanic samples in a wide range of ecological and environmental investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.