ArticleScientific reports2019
An in vivo wound healing model for the characterization of the angiogenic process and its modulation by pharmacological interventions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Skin layer-specific spatiotemporal assessment of micrometabolism during wound angiogenesis.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Potential of stem cell seeded three-dimensional scaffold for regeneration of full-thickness skin wounds.Interface focus · 2022Article
- Highlights on Advancing Frontiers in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022Review
- Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cell-Conditioned Medium Promotes Vascularization of Nanostructured Scaffold Transplanted into Nude Mice.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Label-free concurrent 5-modal microscopy (Co5M) resolves unknown spatio-temporal processes in wound healing.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Long-Term Imaging of Wound Angiogenesis with Large Scale Optoacoustic Microscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Article
- Microfluidic and Lab-on-a-Chip Systems for Cutaneous Wound Healing Studies.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- AZD4547 Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Kidney Injury by Inhibiting Inflammation: The Role of FGFR1 in Renal Tubular Epithelial Cells.Drug design, development and therapy · 2020Article
- An in vivo wound healing model for the characterization of the angiogenic process and its modulation by pharmacological interventions.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiogenesis during wound healing is essential for tissue repair and also affected during cancer treatment by anti-angiogenic drugs. Here, we introduce a minimally invasive wound healing model in the mouse ear to assess angiogenesis with high spatiotemporal resolution in a longitudinal manner in vivo using two-photon microscopy in mice expressing GCaMP2 in arterial endothelial cells. The development of vascular sprouts occurred in a highly orchestrated manner within a time window of 8 days following wounding. Novel sprouts developed exclusively from the distal stump of the transsected arteries, growing towards the proximal arterial stump. This was in line with the incidence of Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.