Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30979868›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2019

Umbilical cord blood versus unrelated donor transplantation in adults with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a report from Eurocord, the Acute Leukemia Working Party and the Cord Blood Committee of the Cellular Therapy and Immunobiology Working Party of the EBMT.

Frédéric Baron, Myriam Labopin, Annalisa Ruggeri, Gerhard Ehninger, Fransesca Bonifazi, Matthias Stelljes, Jaime Sanz, Gernot Stuhler, Alberto Bosi, Nicolaus Kröger and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Frédéric BaronGIGA and CHU of Liege, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium. f.baron@ulg.ac.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-3812
Myriam LabopinDepartment of Haematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Annalisa RuggeriDepartment of Haematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Gerhard EhningerUniversitaetsklinikum Dresden, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Dresden, Germany.
Fransesca BonifaziS.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Institute of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1544-9911
Matthias StelljesDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jaime SanzHematology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Gernot StuhlerDeutsche Klinik für Diagnostik, KMT Zentrum, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Alberto BosiDepartment of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.
Nicolaus KrögerBone Marrow Transplantation Centre, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Maria Teresa Van LintDepartment of Haematology II, Ospedale San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Arnold GanserDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Edouard ForcadeCHU Bordeaux, Service d'hematologie et therapie cellulaire, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Mohamad MohtyDepartment of Haematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Eliane GluckmanEurocord, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Arnon NaglerEBMT Paris Study Office/CEREST-TC, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of umbilical cord blood transplantation (CBT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with active disease at allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains poorly investigated. In this study, we compared transplantation outcomes of 2963 patients with primary refractory or relapsed AML given CBT, 10/10 HLA-matched UD, or 9/10 HLA-matched UD allo-HCT from 2004 to 2015 at EBMT-affiliated centers. Neutrophil engraftment and complete remission rates in CBT, UD 10/10, and UD 9/10 recipients were 75 and 48%, 93 and 69%, and 93 and 70%, respectively. In multivariate Cox analyses, in comparison with CBT (n = 285), UD 10/10 recipients (n = 2001) had a lower incidence of relapse (HR = 0.7, P = 0.001), a lower incidence of non relapse mortality (HR = 0.6, P < 0.001), better GVHD-free and leukemia-free survival (GRFS, HR = 0.8, P < 0.001) and better survival (HR = 0.6, P < 0.001). Further, in comparison with CBT, 9/10 UD recipients (n = 677) also had a lower incidence of relapse (HR = 0.8, P = 0.02), a lower incidence of nonrelapse mortality (HR = 0.7, P = 0.008), better GRFS (HR = 0.8, P = 0.01) and better survival (HR = 0.7, P < 0.001). In summary, these data suggest that in AML patients with active disease at transplantation, allo-HCT with UD results in better transplantation outcomes than CBT.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTransplantation ConditioningUnrelated DonorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30979868
PMCPMC6461673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.