Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30979755›Full record

ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2019

Review of emergency preparedness in the office setting: How best to prepare based on your practice and patient demographic characteristics.

Constance LeBlanc, Jock Murray, Louis Staple, Bridgette Chan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Constance LeBlancEmergency physician at the Charles V. Keating Emergency and Trauma Centre in Halifax, NS, and Professor in the Department of Emergency Medicine and Associate Dean for Continuing Professional Development and Medical Education Research at Dalhousie University. Constance.LeBlanc@dal.ca.
Jock MurrayWorks in emergency medicine and in family medicine in Halifax and is Director of the Enhanced Skills Program and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at Dalhousie University.
Louis StapleMedical student at Dalhousie University.
Bridgette ChanDoctorate of pharmacy candidate in the Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Toronto in Ontario.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo outline an approach to assessing the risk of emergencies in one's medical practice and determining the equipment and medications required for emergencies and the necessary staff training to meet this important facet of patient care. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The emergency preparedness recommendations presented in this article are based on data collected from family physicians' current preparedness plans, formal physician evaluation and informal feedback provided after 2 large group presentations, and the authors' expertise in areas including family medicine, emergency medicine, prehospital care, and pharmacology. MAIN MESSAGE: Delineating risk based on practice profile, location, and demographic characteristics will inform the development of an appropriate plan to meet both public expectations and professional obligations. Reviewing the plan or having a practice drill of the plan once developed will improve the process in the event of an emergency. It is also essential to have medication and equipment checked periodically for expiry dates and proper functioning.

conclusionPhysicians will encounter office emergencies at some time in their practice. Appropriate risk assessment, planning, and preparedness will allow the provision of high-quality care, safety for staff members, the best patient outcomes, and the reward of having managed a time-sensitive problem in an efficient and effective manner.

Indexed as

EmergenciesFamily PracticeHumansPhysicians' OfficesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID30979755
PMCPMC6467671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.