ArticleBiophysical journal2019
Nanobody-CD16 Catch Bond Reveals NK Cell Mechanosensitivity.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibody Fc receptor CD16a mediates natural killer cell activation via mechanotransduction of piconewton forces.Science advances · 2026Article
- Environmentally induced cell stiffening shapes metastatic site selection by tuning the immune vulnerability of cancer cells.Immunity · 2026Article
- Nanobody-based targeted cancer therapy and immunotherapy: fear not the future.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Celldetective, an AI-enhanced image analysis tool for unraveling dynamic cell interactions.eLife · 2026Article
- Mechanotransduction through T cell receptors: consensus, controversies and future outlooks.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanomedicine.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026Article
- Antibody Fc receptor CD16a mediates natural killer cell activation via mechanotransduction of piconewton forces.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Quantitative Microscopy for Cell-Surface and Cell-Cell Interactions in Immunology.Bio-protocol · 2025Article
- Mechanoregulation of lymphocyte cytotoxicity.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025Review
- Mechanoimmunological Control of Metastatic Site Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Evidence and therapeutic implications of biomechanically regulated immunosurveillance in cancer and other diseases.Nature nanotechnology · 2024Review
- Combining DNA scaffolds and acoustic force spectroscopy to characterize individual protein bonds.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Actin cytoskeleton remodeling at the cancer cell side of the immunological synapse: good, bad, or both?Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Nanobodies in cell-mediated immunotherapy: On the road to fight cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Identification and characterization of blocking nanobodies against human CD70.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022Article
- Mechanoregulation of Metastasis beyond the Matrix.Cancer research · 2022Article
- Mechanically active integrins target lytic secretion at the immune synapse to facilitate cellular cytotoxicity.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment by genome editing for precision cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2022Review
- Protocol for measuring weak cellular traction forces using well-controlled ultra-soft polyacrylamide gels.STAR protocols · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibodies are key tools in biomedical research and medicine. Their binding properties are classically measured in solution and characterized by an affinity. However, in physiological conditions, antibodies can bridge an immune effector cell and an antigen-presenting cell, implying that mechanical forces may apply to the bonds. For example, in antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity-a major mode of action of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies-the Fab domains bind the antigens on the target cell, whereas the Fc domain binds to the activating receptor CD16 (also known as FcgRIII) of an immune effector cell, in a quasi-bidimensional environment (2D). Therefore, there is a strong need to investigate antigen/antibody binding under force (2D) to better understand and predict antibody activity in vivo. We used two anti-CD16 nanobodies targeting two different epitopes and laminar flow chamber assay to measure the association and dissociation of single bonds formed between microsphere-bound CD16 antigens and surface-bound anti-CD16 nanobodies (or single-domain antibodies), simulating 2D encounters. The two nanobodies exhibit similar 2D association kinetics, characterized by a strong dependence on the molecular encounter duration. However, their 2D dissociation kinetics strongly differ as a function of applied force: one exhibits a slip bond behavior in which off rate increases with force, and the other exhibits a catch-bond behavior in which off rate decreases with force. This is the first time, to our knowledge, that catch-bond behavior was reported for antigen-antibody bond. Quantification of natural killer cells spreading on surfaces coated with the nanobodies provides a comparison between 2D and three-dimensional adhesion in a cellular context, supporting the hypothesis of natural killer cell mechanosensitivity. Our results may also have strong implications for the design of efficient bispecific antibodies for therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.