Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30979365›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2019

Survivorship care plan experiences among childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and their families.

Samantha T Pannier, Karely Mann, Echo L Warner, Stephanie Rosen, Akanksha Acharya, Claire Hacking, Cheryl Gerdy, Jennifer Wright, Yelena P Wu, Anne C Kirchhoff

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05527392 (Assessing the Effect of Virtual Navigation Interventions to Improve Health Insurance Literacy and Decrease Financial Burden), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05527392 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessing the Effect of Virtual Navigation Interventions to Improve Health Insurance Literacy and Decrease Financial Burden: A Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Randomized Trial (HINTII)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2023 to 2027Enrolled529ConditionsChildhood Cancer SurvivorsArmsHealth Insurance Navigation Tools Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Awareness of diagnosis, treatment and risk of late effects in Chinese survivors of childhood cancer in Hong Kong.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  8. Healthcare provider perspectives on pediatric cancer survivorship care plans: a single institution pilot study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samantha T PannierHuntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Karely MannHuntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Echo L WarnerHuntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Stephanie RosenHuntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Akanksha AcharyaHuntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Claire HackingHuntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Cheryl GerdyPrimary Children's Hospital, Intermountain Healthcare, 100 N. Mario Capecchi Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA.
Jennifer WrightEli Lilly, 212 W 10th St # D180, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Yelena P WuHuntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Anne C KirchhoffHuntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. Anne.Kirchhoff@hci.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-9179

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE-UL1: BPCAUL1RR025764 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2008 to 2011
$19.4M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
Translational Approaches to Melanoma Prevention in Children at High Genetic RiskK07CA196985 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WU, YELENA PING · 2015 to 2019
$682k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000105NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCI NIH HHS K07 CA196985NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs survivorship care plan (SCP) use among childhood cancer survivors and their families has not been extensively researched, we report on their experiences with receiving an SCP after the completion of therapy.

methodsEligible patients had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, completed therapy, and had no evidence of disease at enrollment. Patients aged 7 or older (N = 13) and at least one parent (N = 23 for 20 total patients) were surveyed and completed assessments at enrollment (Time 1, T1), SCP delivery (Time 2, T2), and follow-up (Time 3, T3) (retention 90.9%). Surveys assessed the delivery process and SCP format. McNemar tests were used to assess change from T2-T3.

resultsSatisfaction with the SCP was generally high among parents. At T1 the majority of parents (69.6%) thought the SCP should be delivered after treatment but by T3 most preferred the plan to be delivered before the end of treatment (60.9%). While 95.7% of parents intended to share their child's SCP with another provider, family, or school at T2, only 60.9% had done so by T3 (P < 0.01). At both T2 and T3, 100% of parents agreed that the SCP would help make decisions about their child's future health care. Most patients at T3 (83.3%) felt they had learned something new from their SCP.

conclusionsPediatric oncology patients and families feel SCPs are useful and will help them make decisions about health care in the future.

Indexed as

SurvivorshipAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care PlanningPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRetrospective StudiesLong-term follow upPaediatric cancerSurvivorshipSurvivorship care planTreatment summary

Identifiers

PMID30979365
PMCPMC6461822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.