Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30979363›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2019

Cardiac left ventricular myocardial tissue density, evaluated by computed tomography and autopsy.

Alexandra G Gheorghe, Andreas Fuchs, Christina Jacobsen, Klaus F Kofoed, Rasmus Møgelvang, Niels Lynnerup, Jytte Banner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transforming Treatment: The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Oral Drug Absorption.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cardiac hypertrophy at autopsy.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra G GheorgheSection of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's vej 11, 1 sal, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. svejme@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1682-7865
Andreas FuchsDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christina JacobsenSection of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's vej 11, 1 sal, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Klaus F KofoedDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rasmus MøgelvangDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels LynnerupSection of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's vej 11, 1 sal, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jytte BannerSection of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's vej 11, 1 sal, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft ventricular mass (LVM) is an independent risk factor for the prediction of cardiac events. Its assessment is a clinically important diagnostic procedure in cardiology and may be performed by Computed Tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the cardiac left ventricular shell volume (LVShV) determined by postmortem Computed Tomography (PMCT) and the anatomic LVM obtained at autopsy and to calculate the myocardial tissue density.

methodsA total of 109 deceased individuals were examined with a 64-slice CT scanner and LVShV was determined. At autopsy, the left ventricle was dissected and weighted. The correlation between LVShV and the anatomic LVM was analysed. Asymmetric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy was recorded. Inter-observer variability was evaluated, and a density value for myocardial tissue was calculated.

resultsThe mean age of the deceased was 55 ± 16 years, and 58% was men. We found 30 cases of asymmetric LV hypertrophy. A highly positive correlation existed between LVShV and anatomic LVM (r = 0.857; p < 0.0001), regardless of hypertrophy, asymmetric hypertrophy and gender. The mean difference in the inter-observer variability for LVShV assessment was - 4.4 ml (95% CI: -26.4; 17.6). A linear regression analysis was performed, resulting in a value of 1.265 g/ml for myocardial tissue density. Applying the hitherto used myocardial tissue density of 1.055 g/ml underestimated the anatomic LVM by 18.1% (p < 0.0001).

conclusionPMCT is a helpful tool for the assessment of LVM, and LVShV is highly correlated with LVM as assessed by subsequent autopsy. The correlation between the two was independent of gender, hypertrophy and LV asymmetric hypertrophy. We found a higher myocardial tissue density of 1.265 g/ml compared to previous studies. We show that PMCT combined with autopsy may contribute not only to anatomical but also clinical knowledge.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyFemaleHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultAnatomic Left Ventricular MassComputed TomographyLeft Ventricular MassLeft Ventricular Shell VolumeMyocardial Tissue DensityPost Mortem Computed Tomography

Identifiers

PMID30979363
PMCPMC6461811
OpenAlexW2941750912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.