Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30979313›Full record

ReviewPolymers2016

Polymers in Cartilage Defect Repair of the Knee: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Ralph M Jeuken, Alex K Roth, Ruud J R W Peters, Corrinus C Van Donkelaar, Jens C Thies, Lodewijk W Van Rhijn, Pieter J Emans

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Therapeutic application of hydrogels for bone-related diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ralph M JeukenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht 6229 HX, The Netherlands. r.jeuken@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Alex K RothDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht 6229 HX, The Netherlands. alex.roth@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Ruud J R W PetersDSM Biomedical, Koestraat 1, Geleen 6167 RA, The Netherlands. ruud.peters@dsm.com.
Corrinus C Van DonkelaarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, Eindhoven 5600 MB, The Netherlands. c.c.v.donkelaar@tue.nl.
Jens C ThiesDSM Biomedical, Koestraat 1, Geleen 6167 RA, The Netherlands. jens.thies@dsm.com.
Lodewijk W Van RhijnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht 6229 HX, The Netherlands. l.van.rhijn@mumc.nl.
Pieter J EmansDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht 6229 HX, The Netherlands. pj.emans@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cartilage defects in the knee are often seen in young and active patients. There is a need for effective joint preserving treatments in patients suffering from cartilage defects, as untreated defects often lead to osteoarthritis. Within the last two decades, tissue engineering based techniques using a wide variety of polymers, cell sources, and signaling molecules have been evaluated. We start this review with basic background information on cartilage structure, its intrinsic repair, and an overview of the cartilage repair treatments from a historical perspective. Next, we thoroughly discuss polymer construct components and their current use in commercially available constructs. Finally, we provide an in-depth discussion about construct considerations such as degradation rates, cell sources, mechanical properties, joint homeostasis, and non-degradable/hybrid resurfacing techniques. As future prospects in cartilage repair, we foresee developments in three areas: first, further optimization of degradable scaffolds towards more biomimetic grafts and improved joint environment. Second, we predict that patient-specific non-degradable resurfacing implants will become increasingly applied and will provide a feasible treatment for older patients or failed regenerative treatments. Third, we foresee an increase of interest in hybrid construct, which combines degradable with non-degradable materials.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbiomimeticcartilage repairfunctional natural polymersfunctional synthetic polymersknee jointresurfacingscaffoldtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30979313
PMCPMC6432241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.