ReviewPolymers2016
Decorating Nanoparticle Surface for Targeted Drug Delivery: Opportunities and Challenges.
Review in Polymers, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metal-decorated graphdiyne nanocarriers for favipiravir delivery: a DFT investigation.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide CRISPR Screen Reveals PIK3CA Inhibition Enhances Lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated siRNA Delivery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Progress in the Application of Nanomaterials in Tumor Treatment.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Nanomaterial-based encapsulation of biochemicals for targeted sepsis therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Active targeting of type 1 diabetes therapies to pancreatic beta cells using nanocarriers.Diabetologia · 2025Review
- Recent Trends and Applications of Nanostructure-based Drug Delivery in Alleviating Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).Current drug delivery · 2025Review
- Renal Clearable H-Dots Leveraging Ligand Complexation for Enhanced Active Tumor Targeting.Small science · 2024Article
- Intestinal biofilms: pathophysiological relevance, host defense, and therapeutic opportunities.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Nanomedicine in Neuroprotection, Neuroregeneration, and Blood-Brain Barrier Modulation: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Design Principles for Smart Linear Polymer Ligand Carriers with Efficient Transcellular Transport Capabilities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The Role of Biological Rhythms in New Drug Formulations to Cross the Brain Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Polydots, soft nanoparticles, at membrane interfaces.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Peptide-Based Nanoparticles for Systemic Extrahepatic Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleotides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery to Brain: Interventions of Surface Modification.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Review
- Strategies and Progress of Raman Technologies for Cellular Uptake Analysis of the Drug Delivery Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in Endocannabinoid System Targeting for Improved Specificity: Strategic Approaches to Targeted Drug Delivery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Green Metallic Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Evaluation Models and Cancer Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Review
- The Efficiency of AuNPs in Cancer Cell Targeting Compared to Other Nanomedicine Technologies Using Fuzzy PROMETHEE.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in Nanocarrier-Assisted Therapeutics Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The size, shape, stiffness (composition) and surface properties of nanoparticles (NPs) have been recognized as key design parameters for NP-mediated drug delivery platforms. Among them, the surface functionalization of NPs is of great significance for targeted drug delivery. For instance, targeting moieties are covalently coated on the surface of NPs to improve their selectively and affinity to cancer cells. However, due to a broad range of possible choices of surface decorating molecules, it is difficult to choose the proper one for targeted functions. In this work, we will review several representative experimental and computational studies in selecting the proper surface functional groups. Experimental studies reveal that: (1) the NPs with surface decorated amphiphilic polymers can enter the cell interior through penetrating pathway; (2) the NPs with tunable stiffness and identical surface chemistry can be selectively accepted by the diseased cells according to their stiffness; and (3) the NPs grafted with pH-responsive polymers can be accepted or rejected by the cells due to the local pH environment. In addition, we show that computer simulations could be useful to understand the detailed physical mechanisms behind these phenomena and guide the design of next-generation NP-based drug carriers with high selectivity, affinity, and low toxicity. For example, the detailed free energy analysis and molecular dynamics simulation reveals that amphiphilic polymer-decorated NPs can penetrate into the cell membrane through the "snorkeling" mechanism, by maximizing the interaction energy between the hydrophobic ligands and lipid tails. We anticipate that this work will inspire future studies in the design of environment-responsive NPs for targeted drug delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.