Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30979076›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2019

Effect of Red, Processed, and White Meat Consumption on the Risk of Gastric Cancer: An Overall and Dose⁻Response Meta-Analysis.

Seong Rae Kim, Kyuwoong Kim, Sang Ah Lee, Sung Ok Kwon, Jong-Koo Lee, NaNa Keum, Sang Min Park

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers, 59 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 59 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 59 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Seong Rae KimDepartment of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, South Korea. kwkim238@gmail.com.
Kyuwoong KimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul 03080, South Korea. kwkim238@gmail.com.
Sang Ah LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do 24341, South Korea. sangahlee@kangwon.ac.kr.
Sung Ok KwonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do 24341, South Korea. kamelon@hanmail.net.
Jong-Koo LeeJW Lee Center for Global Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03087, South Korea. kcdc7000@gmail.com.
NaNa KeumDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. nak212@mail.harvard.edu.
Sang Min ParkDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul 03080, South Korea. smpark.snuh@gmail.com.
Seoul National University · KRKangwon National University · KRHarvard University · US

Funding

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety 16162MFDS590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensDietDucksFood HandlingHumansMeatMeat ProductsMEDLINEOdds RatioPoultryRabbitsRed MeatRiskRisk FactorsStomach Neoplasmscancer epidemiologygastric cancerprocessed meatred meatwhite meat

Identifiers

PMID30979076
PMCPMC6520977
OpenAlexW2937141947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.