Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30978944›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

We Don't Have a Lot of Healthy Options: Food Environment Perceptions of First-Year, Minority College Students Attending a Food Desert Campus.

Jaapna Dhillon, L Karina Diaz Rios, Kaitlyn J Aldaz, Natalie De La Cruz, Emily Vu, Syed Asad Asghar, Quintin Kuse, Rudy M Ortiz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Healthy Food Policies Documented in University Food Service Contracts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaapna DhillonSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. jdhillon5@ucmerced.edu.
L Karina Diaz RiosDivision of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. kdiazrios@ucmerced.edu.
Kaitlyn J AldazSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. kaldaz@ucmerced.edu.
Natalie De La CruzSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. ndelacruz2@ucmerced.edu.
Emily VuSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. evu2@ucmerced.edu.
Syed Asad AsgharSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. sasghar@ucmerced.edu.
Quintin KuseSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. qkuse@ucmerced.edu.
Rudy M OrtizSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. rortiz@ucmerced.edu.
University of California, Merced · US

Funding

Almond Board of California -NIH HHS 1K99MD012815-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First-year college students are at particular risk of dietary maladaptation during their transition to adulthood. A college environment that facilitates consistent access to nutritious food is critical to ensuring dietary adequacy among students. The objective of the study was to examine perceptions of the campus food environment and its influence on the eating choices of first-year students attending a minority-serving university located in a food desert. Focus group interviews with twenty-one first-year students were conducted from November 2016 to January 2017. Students participated in 1 of 5 focus groups. Most interviewees identified as being of Hispanic/Latino or Asian/Pacific Islander origin. A grounded theory approach was applied for inductive identification of relevant concepts and deductive interpretation of patterns and relationships among themes. Themes related to the perceived food environment included adequacy (i.e., variety and quality), acceptability (i.e., familiarity and preferences), affordability, and accessibility (i.e., convenience and accommodation). Subjective norms and processes of decisional balance and agency were themes characterizing interpersonal and personal factors affecting students' eating choices. The perceived environment appeared to closely interact with subjective norms to inform internal processes of decision-making and agency around the eating choices of first-year students attending a minority-serving university campus located in a food desert.

Indexed as

EnvironmentFood PreferencesFood QualityStudentsUniversitiesAdolescentAsian PeopleChoice BehaviorCosts and Cost AnalysisDietDiet, HealthyFocus GroupsFoodHispanic or LatinoHumansMinority Groupsbarrierscollegediet qualityfacilitatorsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30978944
PMCPMC6520682
OpenAlexW2940081640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.