Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30978431›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2019

Widespread gene transfer to malignant gliomas with In vitro-to-In vivo correlation.

Karina Negron, Namir Khalasawi, Billy Lu, Chi-Ying Ho, Jason Lee, Siddharth Shenoy, Hai-Quan Mao, Tza-Huei Wang, Justin Hanes, Jung Soo Suk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sonoselective Transfection of Glioma Endothelium.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Therapeutic RNA Delivery for COVID and Other Diseases.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karina NegronCenter for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Pharmacology & Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America.
Namir KhalasawiDepartment of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America.
Billy LuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America.
Chi-Ying HoCenter for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America.
Jason LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America.
Siddharth ShenoyCenter for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America.
Hai-Quan MaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Material Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America.
Tza-Huei WangInstitute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America.
Justin HanesCenter for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Pharmacology & Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America.
Jung Soo SukCenter for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America. Electronic address: jsuk@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Wilmer Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY001765 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ji Yi · 1985 to 2026
$22.1M
Brain Tumor-Penetrating Nanoparticle Delivery with MR-Guided Focused UltrasoundR01CA164789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
Immunotherapeutic Nanoparticle Delivery to Melanoma With MR-Guided Focused UltrasoundR01CA197111 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BULLOCK, TIMOTHY N, ENGELHARD, VICTOR H · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
Innovative systemic gene therapy for treating Parkinson's diseaseR01NS111102 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI PRICE, RICHARD J., SUK, JUNG SOO · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
Targeted Delivery of Brain Penetrating DNA Nanoparticles to Brain TumorsR01CA204968 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., SUK, JUNG SOO · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Master Regulatory MicroRNAs in GlioblastomaU01CA220841 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ABOUNADER, ROGER · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
MRI-Guided miRNA Nanoparticle Delivery to Glioblastoma With Focused UltrasoundR01EB020147 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164789NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197111NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204968NCI NIH HHS U01 CA220841NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001765NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020147NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy of malignant gliomas has shown a lack of clinical success to date due in part to inability of conventional gene vectors to achieve widespread gene transfer throughout highly disseminated tumor areas within the brain. Here, we demonstrate that newly engineered polymer-based DNA-loaded nanoparticles (DNA-NP) possessing small particle diameters (~50 nm) and non-adhesive surface polyethylene glycol (PEG) coatings efficiently penetrate brain tumor tissue as well as healthy brain parenchyma. Specifically, this brain-penetrating nanoparticle (BPN), following intracranial administration via convection enhanced delivery (CED), provides widespread transgene expression in heathy rodent striatum and an aggressive brain tumor tissue established orthotopically in rats. The ability of BPN to efficiently traverse both tissues is of great importance as the highly invasive glioma cells infiltrated into normal brain tissue are responsible for tumor recurrence. Of note, the transgene expression within the orthotopic tumor tissue occurred preferentially in glioma cells over microglial cells. We also show that three-dimensional (3D) multicellular spheroids established with malignant glioma cells, unlike conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures, serve as an excellent in vitro model reliably predicting gene vector behaviors in vivo. Briefly, DNA-NP possessing greater surface PEG coverage exhibited more uniform and higher-level transgene expression both in the 3D model and in vivo, whereas the trend was opposite in 2D culture. The finding here alerts that gene transfer studies based primarily on 2D cultures should be interpreted with caution and underscores the relevance of 3D models for screening newly engineered gene vectors prior to their in vivo evaluation.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyAnimalsBrainBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDNAFemaleGene ExpressionGliomaNanoparticlesPolyethylene GlycolsPolyethyleneimineRats, Inbred F344Spheroids, CellularTransgenesDNAPolyethylene GlycolsPolyethyleneimineConvection enhanced deliveryMalignant gliomasSynthetic gene vectorsTumor spheroidsVolume of transgene expression

Identifiers

PMID30978431
PMCPMC6579670
OpenAlexW2940069688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.