Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30978258›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Development and validation of a clinical model for preconception and early pregnancy risk prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in nulliparous women.

Brittney M Donovan, Patrick J Breheny, Jennifer G Robinson, Rebecca J Baer, Audrey F Saftlas, Wei Bao, Andrea L Greiner, Knute D Carter, Scott P Oltman, Larry Rand and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brittney M DonovanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8356-3965
Patrick J BrehenyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Jennifer G RobinsonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Rebecca J BaerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Audrey F SaftlasDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Wei BaoDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Andrea L GreinerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Knute D CarterDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6710-4029
Scott P OltmanCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Larry RandCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Laura L Jelliffe-PawlowskiCalifornia Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Kelli K RyckmanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
University of Iowa · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
Clinical and Translational Training Program in Pulmonary MedicineT32HL087738 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lorraine B Ware · 2007 to 2026
$7.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL087738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of dietary and lifestyle interventions prior to and early in pregnancy in high risk women has been shown to reduce the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) development later in pregnancy. Although numerous risk factors for GDM have been identified, the ability to accurately identify women before or early in pregnancy who could benefit most from these interventions remains limited. As nulliparous women are an under-screened population with risk profiles that differ from their multiparous counterparts, development of a prediction model tailored to nulliparous women may facilitate timely preventive intervention and improve maternal and infant outcomes. We aimed to develop and validate a model for preconception and early pregnancy prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus based on clinical risk factors for nulliparous women. A risk prediction model was built within a large California birth cohort including singleton live birth records from 2007-2012. Model accuracy was assessed both internally and externally, within a cohort of women who delivered at University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 2009-2017, using discrimination and calibration. Differences in predictive accuracy of the model were assessed within specific racial/ethnic groups. The prediction model included five risk factors: race/ethnicity, age at delivery, pre-pregnancy body mass index, family history of diabetes, and pre-existing hypertension. The area under the curve (AUC) for the California internal validation cohort was 0.732 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.728, 0.735), and 0.710 (95% CI 0.672, 0.749) for the Iowa external validation cohort. The model performed particularly well in Hispanic (AUC 0.739) and Black women (AUC 0.719). Our findings suggest that estimation of a woman's risk for GDM through model-based incorporation of risk factors accurately identifies those at high risk (i.e., predicted risk >6%) who could benefit from preventive intervention encouraging prompt incorporation of this tool into preconception and prenatal care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexCaliforniaCohort StudiesDiabetes, GestationalEthnicityFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalParityPreconception CarePregnancyPregnancy Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30978258
PMCPMC6461273
OpenAlexW2938163383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.