Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30978250›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Effect of three different forms of handling on the variation of aggression-associated parameters in individually and group-housed male C57BL/6NCrl mice.

Sinja Mertens, Miriam A Vogt, Peter Gass, Rupert Palme, Bernhard Hiebl, Sabine Chourbaji

Expression of concernAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of Refinements to Handling and Restraint Methods in Mice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sinja MertensInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour and Virtual Center for Replacement-Complementary Methods to Animal Testing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-7598
Miriam A VogtUniversity of Heidelberg, Interfaculty Biomedical Research Facility (IBF), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3400-5067
Peter GassUniversity of Heidelberg, Central Institute of Mental Health (CIMH), Mannheim Faculty, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rupert PalmeUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Unit of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Experimental Endocrinology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9466-3662
Bernhard HieblInstitute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour and Virtual Center for Replacement-Complementary Methods to Animal Testing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6450-0675
Sabine ChourbajiUniversity of Heidelberg, Interfaculty Biomedical Research Facility (IBF), Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice are social animals hence group-housing of mice is preferred over individual housing. However, aggression in group-housed male mice under laboratory housing conditions is a well-known problem leading to serious health issues, including injury or death. Therefore, group-housed mice are frequently separated for welfare reasons. In this study, we investigated the effect of 3 different handling methods (tail, forceps, tube) in 2 different housing conditions (single vs. group) on the variance of aggression-associated parameters in male C57BL/6NCrl mice over 8 weeks. Blood glucose concentration, body weight, body temperature, plus number and severity of bite wounds and barbering intensity in group-housed mice were recorded. An assessment of nest complexity was also performed weekly. Feces were collected in week 3 and 7 for analysis of corticosterone metabolites. We also monitored the level of aggression by recording the behavior of group-housed animals after weekly cage cleaning. An open field test followed by a social novel object test, a light/dark box test, a hotplate and a resident-intruder test were performed at the end of the 8-week handling period. Post-mortem, we assessed organ weights. We found that forceps-handled mice, independent of the housing condition, had significantly higher levels of stress-induced-hyperthermia and enhanced aggression after cage cleaning, and they performed worse in the nest complexity test. In addition, handling male mice by the tail seems to be most effective to reduce aggressiveness after transferring animals into new cages, thereby representing an appropriate refinement.

Indexed as

Housing, AnimalAggressionAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCorticosteroneMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSocial BehaviorStress, PhysiologicalCorticosterone

Identifiers

PMID30978250
PMCPMC6461241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.