Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30978247›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

ZooArchNet: Connecting zooarchaeological specimens to the biodiversity and archaeology data networks.

Michelle J LeFebvre, Laura Brenskelle, John Wieczorek, Sarah Whitcher Kansa, Eric C Kansa, Neill J Wallis, Jessica N King, Kitty F Emery, Robert Guralnick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The human side of biodiversity: coevolution of the human niche, palaeo-synanthropy and ecosystem complexity in the deep human past.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Promoting data quality and reuse in archaeology through collaborative identifier practices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The next chapter of human-plague science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle J LeFebvreFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1741-9997
Laura BrenskelleFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-8871
John WieczorekMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Sarah Whitcher KansaOpen Context, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Eric C KansaOpen Context, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Neill J WallisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4740-286X
Jessica N KingFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Kitty F EmeryFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Robert GuralnickFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Florida Museum of Natural History · USContextual Change (United States) · USMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interdisciplinary collaborations and data sharing are essential to addressing the long history of human-environmental interactions underlying the modern biodiversity crisis. Such collaborations are increasingly facilitated by, and dependent upon, sharing open access data from a variety of disciplinary communities and data sources, including those within biology, paleontology, and archaeology. Significant advances in biodiversity open data sharing have focused on neontological and paleontological specimen records, making available over a billion records through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility. But to date, less effort has been placed on the integration of important archaeological sources of biodiversity, such as zooarchaeological specimens. Zooarchaeological specimens are rich with both biological and cultural heritage data documenting nearly all phases of human interaction with animals and the surrounding environment through time, filling a critical gap between paleontological and neontological sources of data within biodiversity networks. Here we describe technical advances for mobilizing zooarchaeological specimen-specific biological and cultural data. In particular, we demonstrate adaptations in the workflow used by biodiversity publisher VertNet to mobilize Darwin Core formatted zooarchaeological data to the GBIF network. We also show how a linked open data approach can be used to connect existing biodiversity publishing mechanisms with archaeoinformatics publishing mechanisms through collaboration with the Open Context platform. Examples of ZooArchNet published datasets are used to show the efficacy of creating this critically needed bridge between biological and archaeological sources of open access data. These technical advances and efforts to support data publication are placed in the larger context of ZooarchNet, a new project meant to build community around new approaches to interconnect zoorchaeological data and knowledge across disciplines.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyBiodiversityZoologyAnimalsDatabases, FactualHumansInformation DisseminationInformation Storage and RetrievalMetadataPublishingWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID30978247
PMCPMC6461259
OpenAlexW2938383673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.