Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30978192›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Results from an online survey of adults with cystic fibrosis: Accessing and using life expectancy information.

Ruth H Keogh, Diana Bilton, Rebecca Cosgriff, Dominic Kavanagh, Oliver Rayner, Philip M Sedgwick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Opportunities and pitfalls of social media research in rare genetic diseases: a systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Target Diseases for Neonatal Screening in Germany.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Recommended shielding against COVID-19 impacts physical activity levels in adults with cystic fibrosis.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruth H KeoghDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-3253
Diana BiltonRoyal Brompton Hospital, Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca CosgriffCystic Fibrosis Trust, One Aldgate, Second floor, London, United Kingdom.
Dominic KavanaghCystic Fibrosis Trust, One Aldgate, Second floor, London, United Kingdom.
Oliver RaynerCystic Fibrosis Trust, One Aldgate, Second floor, London, United Kingdom.
Philip M SedgwickInstitute for Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M014827/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the one of the most common inherited diseases. It affects around 10,000 people in the UK, and the median survival age is 47. Recent developments making use of longitudinal patient registry data are producing more detailed and relevant information about predicted life expectancy in CF based on current age and clinical measurements. The objective of this study was toconduct an online survey of adults with CF living in the UK using a web-based questionnaire to investigate: (i) if and how they access information on life expectancy; (ii) what they use it for; (iii) if they want more personalised information on life expectancy or the time until other milestones. The survey was advertised through the Cystic Fibrosis Trust using social media. There were 85 respondents, covering men (39%) and women (61%) aged 16-65. 75% had received information on life expectancy either from their CF care team (34%) or other sources (71%), the most common being the Cystic Fibrosis Trust website and research literature. Most people who received information found it to be beneficial and reported using it in a variety of ways, including to plan strategies for maintaining as best health as possible and to psychologically manage current health status. 82% of respondents were interested in more personalised information about their life expectancy, and participants also noted interest in other outcomes, including time to needing transplant or reaching a low level of lung function. Themes arising in text responses included the importance of good communication of information, the difficulty of relating general information to one's own circumstances, and a desire for increased information on factors that impact on survival in CF. As an outcome from this work, research is underway to establish how information on life expectancy can be presented to people with CF in an accessible way.

Indexed as

Life ExpectancySocial MediaAdolescentAdultAgedCystic FibrosisFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30978192
PMCPMC6461271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.