Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30977937›Full record

ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2019

Dermoscopy use in UK primary care: a survey of GPs with a special interest in dermatology.

O T Jones, L C Jurascheck, M Utukuri, M M Pannebakker, J Emery, F M Walter

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dermoscopy Features of Cutaneous Warts.International journal of general medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Teledermatology and its Current Perspective.Indian dermatology online journal
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

O T JonesThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
L C JurascheckClinical School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
M UtukuriClinical School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
M M PannebakkerThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
J EmeryThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
F M WalterThe Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Melbourne · AUVictorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK C8640/A23385Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-030National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) RG 68235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelanoma accounts for 90% of skin cancer mortality and typically presents in primary care, where it can be challenging to distinguish from benign lesions. Dermoscopy is a tool for skin visualization that is routinely used for melanoma diagnosis in secondary care. However, the role of dermoscopy in primary care remains unclear.

objectivesTo determine views on, and use of, dermoscopy by dermatology-interested general practitioners (GPs).

methodsAn online questionnaire was emailed to the UK Primary Care Dermatology Society members in February 2018, and responses collected over the following 4 weeks.

resultsA total of 205 responses were analysed. Most respondents were GPs (94%), aged over 50 (53%), had a postgraduate dermatological qualification (67%) and used dermoscopy regularly when reviewing pigmented skin lesions (97%). Dermoscopy use was commoner amongst GPs who had worked longer in primary care and had experience of secondary care dermatology. Most had undertaken training in dermoscopy (91%), although one-fifth (20%) had not updated their training in over 5 years. Most of those who had received only 1 day of face-to-face training reported feeling confident using a dermatoscope. Few respondents (11%) reported access to teledermatology or teledermoscopy for urgent or routine referrals.

conclusionsUK GPs with a special interest in dermatology are routinely using dermoscopy in the primary care setting. More research is needed to establish optimal approaches to training and updating GP dermoscopy skills. When dermoscopy has been shown to be safe, effective, acceptable and cost-effective in this setting, more GPs may also be able to gain and maintain the skills to implement dermoscopy into routine primary care. Technological advances, including incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithms to guide GPs, could also contribute to widening use of dermoscopy among GPs.

Indexed as

DermoscopyPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Skin NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30977937
PMCPMC6767170
OpenAlexW2936305131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.