ArticleThe Journal of organic chemistry2019
Structure Determination of a Chloroenyne from Laurencia majuscula Using Computational Methods and Total Synthesis.
Article in The Journal of organic chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stereoselective total synthesis of (3RSC advances · 2023Article
- Naturally Occurring Organohalogen Compounds-A Comprehensive Review.Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products · 2023Review
- Total Synthesis and Structure Confirmation of (Organic letters · 2022Article
- Mitsunobu Reaction: A Powerful Tool for the Synthesis of Natural Products: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- TMKS8A, an antibacterial and cytotoxic chlorinated α-lapachone, from a sea slug-derived actinomycete of the genus Streptomyces.The Journal of antibiotics · 2021Article
- Total synthesis and complete configurational assignment of amphirionin-2.Chemical science · 2020Article
- Forwards and backwards - synthesis ofChemical science · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite numerous advances in spectroscopic methods through the latter part of the 20th century, the unequivocal structure determination of natural products can remain challenging, and inevitably, incorrect structures appear in the literature. Computational methods that allow the accurate prediction of NMR chemical shifts have emerged as a powerful addition to the toolbox of methods available for the structure determination of small organic molecules. Herein, we report the structure determination of a small, stereochemically rich natural product from Laurencia majuscula using the powerful combination of computational methods and total synthesis, along with the structure confirmation of notoryne, using the same approach. Additionally, we synthesized three further diastereomers of the L. majuscula enyne and have demonstrated that computations are able to distinguish each of the four synthetic diastereomers from the 32 possible diastereomers of the natural product. Key to the success of this work is to analyze the computational data to provide the greatest distinction between each diastereomer, by identifying chemical shifts that are most sensitive to changes in relative stereochemistry. The success of the computational methods in the structure determination of stereochemically rich, flexible organic molecules will allow all involved in structure determination to use these methods with confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.