Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30977320›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2019

Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

Zeiad H Eldaly, Mahmoud A Abdelsalam, Mohamed S Hussein, Mohamed A Nassr

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04426175 (Precision of 2D vs 3D Low Energy Femto-LASIK), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04426175 nacompletednot on this map

Precision of 2D vs 3D Low Energy Femto-LASIK: Intraoperative and Postoperative OCT-based Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorZentrumsehstarke HamburgRan2019 to 2020Enrolled13ConditionsMyopia, AstigmatismArms2D and 3D cutting method using a low energy Femtosecond laser LDV Z8 for LASIK flap cutting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zeiad H EldalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. dr_ziadeldaly@aun.edu.eg.
Mahmoud A AbdelsalamDepartment of Ophthalmology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Mohamed S HusseinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Mohamed A NassrDepartment of Ophthalmology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate laser

methodsFifty-two candidates for the LASIK procedure were stratified into two groups: FS laser-assisted (Allegretto FS-200) and MK flap creation (Moria 2). Flap thickness was determined at five points. The side-cut angle was measured in three directions at the margin interface. LASIK flap assessment was performed one month postoperatively by Spectralis anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

resultsFifty-two patients (93 eyes) were recruited; 49 eyes were stratified to the FS group and 44 eyes to the MK group. The FS group had relatively even flap configurations, and the MK group had meniscus-shaped flaps. Mean differences between planned and actual flap thickness were 12.93 ± 8.89 and 19.91 ± 5.77 μm in the FS and MK groups, respectively. In thin flaps (100 to 110 μm), there was a significant disparity between the two groups (7.80 ± 4.71 and 19.44 ± 4.46 μm in the FS and MK groups, respectively). However, in thicker flaps (130 μm), comparable flap thickness disparity was achieved (18.54 ± 9.52 and 20.83 ± 5.99 μm in the FS and MK groups, respectively). Mean side-cut angle was 74.29 ± 5.79 degrees and 32.34 ± 4.94 degrees in the FS and MK groups, respectively.

conclusionsComparable flap thickness predictability was achieved in thicker flaps (130 μm), while the FS laser technique yielded a more predictable result in thinner flaps (100 to 110 μm). Different flap morphology was observed in meniscus flaps in MK-LASIK and flap morphology in FS-LASIK.

Indexed as

Surgical FlapsAdultAnterior Eye SegmentEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKeratomileusis, Laser In SituLasers, ExcimerMaleMyopiaPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesRefraction, OcularTomography, Optical CoherenceAnterior segment optical coherence tomographyFlap morphologyLaser in situ keratomileusis

Identifiers

PMID30977320
PMCPMC6462471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.