ArticleKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2019
Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study.
Article in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04426175 (Precision of 2D vs 3D Low Energy Femto-LASIK), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Precision of 2D vs 3D Low Energy Femto-LASIK: Intraoperative and Postoperative OCT-based Study
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flap Thickness and the Risk of Complications in Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: A Literature Review and Statistical Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comparison of Flap Characteristics Created with Two Different Methods in Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK).Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2021Article
- Safety and Precision of Two Different Flap-morphologies Created During Low Energy Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
- Femtosecond laser applications in corneal surgery.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate laser
methodsFifty-two candidates for the LASIK procedure were stratified into two groups: FS laser-assisted (Allegretto FS-200) and MK flap creation (Moria 2). Flap thickness was determined at five points. The side-cut angle was measured in three directions at the margin interface. LASIK flap assessment was performed one month postoperatively by Spectralis anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
resultsFifty-two patients (93 eyes) were recruited; 49 eyes were stratified to the FS group and 44 eyes to the MK group. The FS group had relatively even flap configurations, and the MK group had meniscus-shaped flaps. Mean differences between planned and actual flap thickness were 12.93 ± 8.89 and 19.91 ± 5.77 μm in the FS and MK groups, respectively. In thin flaps (100 to 110 μm), there was a significant disparity between the two groups (7.80 ± 4.71 and 19.44 ± 4.46 μm in the FS and MK groups, respectively). However, in thicker flaps (130 μm), comparable flap thickness disparity was achieved (18.54 ± 9.52 and 20.83 ± 5.99 μm in the FS and MK groups, respectively). Mean side-cut angle was 74.29 ± 5.79 degrees and 32.34 ± 4.94 degrees in the FS and MK groups, respectively.
conclusionsComparable flap thickness predictability was achieved in thicker flaps (130 μm), while the FS laser technique yielded a more predictable result in thinner flaps (100 to 110 μm). Different flap morphology was observed in meniscus flaps in MK-LASIK and flap morphology in FS-LASIK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.