ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2019
Prognostic Value of O-(2-[
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Prognostic stratification of newly diagnosed IDH-mutant gliomas by [18F]fluoroethyltyrosine and [11C]methionine PET: A retrospective, bicentric cohort study.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopy for enhanced multiparametric MRI characterization of [EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Contribution of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Preferential tumor localization in relation toJournal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
- Maximum Uptake and Hypermetabolic Volume of 18F-FDOPA PET Estimate Molecular Status and Overall Survival in Low-Grade Gliomas: A PET and MRI Study.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Hypometabolic gliomas on FET-PET-is there an inverted U-curve for survival?Neuro-oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe use of [ PROCEDURES: A total of 35 treatment-naive patients (mean age, 48 ± 17 years) with histologically proven WHO grade II or III gliomas as defined by the current 2016 WHO classification were included. Static PET/CT imaging was performed 20 min after intravenous [
resultsFourteen patients presented with grade II (diffuse astrocytoma n = 10, oligodendroglioma n = 4) and 21 patients with grade III glioma (anaplastic astrocytoma n = 15, anaplastic oligodendroglioma n = 6). Twenty-seven out of the 35 patients were PET-positive (grade II n = 8/14, grade III n = 19/21), with grade III tumors exhibiting significantly higher amino acid uptake (TBR
conclusionsAmino acid uptake as assessed by [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.