ArticleClinical drug investigation2019
Paediatric Integrase Inhibitor Use in a Real-Life Setting: A Single-Centre Cohort Experience 2009-2018.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir and raltegravir for treating children and adolescents living with HIV: a systematic review.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022Pooled it
- Neuropsychiatric manifestations and sleep disturbances with dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy versus standard of care in children and adolescents: a secondary analysis of the ODYSSEY trial.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2023Trial
- Article
- Outcomes of Integrase Inhibitor-based Antiretroviral Therapy in a Clinical Cohort of Treatment-experienced Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With HIV Infection.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIntegrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) have become the preferred first-line antiretroviral therapy in adults. There is paucity of published data on their use in children outside of clinical trials, particularly long-term safety and tolerability. This study aimed to describe INSTI use including the number of, and reasons for INSTI discontinuation.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis by database and electronic record review of children aged under 18 years with perinatally acquired human immunodeficiency virus who started INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy between May 2009 and March 2018, in a single tertiary centre.
resultsFifty-six INSTI-based regimens were prescribed in 54 children, 64.9% from 2015 onwards. Twenty-one of 56 (37.5%) regimens commenced with raltegravir, 29 (51.8%) with dolutegravir and six (10.7%) with elvitegravir. The median age at the start of treatment was 15 years (interquartile range 13.5-16.4) with a median duration of INSTI-antiretroviral therapy of 1.65 years (range 0.01-8.8). Twenty-four children had a detectable viral load at the start INSTI therapy; 20 (83%) achieving viral suppression in a median of 26 days (interquartile range 19.5-34.5). There were 26 discontinuations of INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy after a median of 183 days; 9/26 because of adverse events. Four of nine adverse events were attributed to INSTI use, all in patients taking dolutegravir and the adverse events were neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal in nature.
conclusionsINSTI-based regimens were generally efficacious and well tolerated in this paediatric cohort, with 4/26 discontinuations due to INSTI-attributed adverse events. Further post-marketing surveillance of INSTI use in children is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30976998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.