Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976938›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2019

High diagnostic efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescent urine cytology for urothelial carcinoma.

Gaku Yamamichi, Wataru Nakata, Masaru Tani, Go Tsujimura, Yuichi Tsujimoto, Mikio Nin, Akihiro Mimura, Hideaki Miwa, Masao Tsujihata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Shedding Light on Bladder Cancer Diagnosis in Urine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Detection of bladder cancer using voided urine sample and by targeting genomic VPAC receptors.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaku YamamichiDepartment of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Nagasone-cho 1179-3, Kitaku, Sakaishi, Osaka, Japan.
Wataru NakataDepartment of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Nagasone-cho 1179-3, Kitaku, Sakaishi, Osaka, Japan. nakata_wa@osakah.johas.go.jp.
Masaru TaniDepartment of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Nagasone-cho 1179-3, Kitaku, Sakaishi, Osaka, Japan.
Go TsujimuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Nagasone-cho 1179-3, Kitaku, Sakaishi, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichi TsujimotoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Nagasone-cho 1179-3, Kitaku, Sakaishi, Osaka, Japan.
Mikio NinDepartment of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Nagasone-cho 1179-3, Kitaku, Sakaishi, Osaka, Japan.
Akihiro MimuraDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hideaki MiwaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masao TsujihataDepartment of Urology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Nagasone-cho 1179-3, Kitaku, Sakaishi, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka Rosai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn general, urine cytology is often problematic because of its low sensitivity, especially for low-grade urothelial carcinoma (UC) in clinical practice. To improve the sensitivity, we focused on 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), because recent studies suggested that 5-ALA-induced urine cytology can be used for photodynamic diagnosis. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of 5-ALA-induced fluorescent urine cytology for UC.

methodsWe included in this study 318 patients comprising 158 non-cancer patients, 84 bladder tumor patients, and 76 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) patients treated in our institution from March 2013 to September 2018. Using the same voided urine sample, we compared sensitivity and specificity between conventional urine cytology and 5-ALA-induced fluorescent urine cytology.

resultsOverall, the sensitivity of 5-ALA-induced fluorescent urine cytology was significantly higher than that of conventional urine cytology (86.9% vs. 69.4%; p = 0.0002), and the specificity was equivalently high (96.2% vs. 95.6%; p = 1.0). In subgroup analysis, the high sensitivity of 5-ALA-induced fluorescent urine cytology was also detected regardless of age, sex, and tumor type. However, in terms of stage and grade, differences were only detected in patients with less than pTa stage (89.2% vs. 52.1%; p = 0.0001) and low-grade tumor (91.5% vs. 51.1%; p < 0.0001).

conclusions5-ALA-induced fluorescent urine cytology was significantly more effective for UC diagnosis when compared with the conventional cytology, especially in patients with low-stage and low-grade tumors. These findings indicate that 5-ALA-induced fluorescent urine cytology may potentially be a very useful tool for clinical use.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAminolevulinic AcidCytodiagnosisFemaleFluorescenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrineUrologic NeoplasmsAminolevulinic Acid5-Aminolevulinic acidCytologySensitivitySpecificityUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID30976938
OpenAlexW2936123346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.