Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976908›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2019

Population pharmacokinetics of palonosetron and model-based assessment of dosing strategies.

Seongheon Lee, Injae Kim, Taehee Pyeon, Sooeun Lee, Jia Song, Jeeyun Rhee, Seongwook Jeong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04533867 (Comparison of Palonosetron and Ondansetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Bariatric Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04533867 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Palonosetron and Ondansetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Bariatric Surgery

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBagcilar Training and Research HospitalRan2020 to 2021Enrolled100ConditionsNausea, Postoperative, Vomiting, Postoperative, Patient Reported Outcomes, Pain, PostoperativeArmsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, Palonosetron 1mcg/kg, Ondansetron 1 mg/kg, max dose 8 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seongheon LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, South Korea.
Injae KimDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
Taehee PyeonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, South Korea.
Sooeun LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, South Korea.
Jia SongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, South Korea.
Jeeyun RheeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, South Korea.
Seongwook JeongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 160, Baekseo-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, South Korea. anesman@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1958-8436
Chonnam National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePalonosetron is the most recent 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, and its fixed dose of 0.075 mg is indicated for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. This study aimed to examine whether fixed dosing is more appropriate than body size-based dosing through the development of a population pharmacokinetic model and model-based simulations.

methodsFifty-one adult patients undergoing general anesthesia received single intravenous palonosetron administrations 30 min before the end of surgery. Palonosetron concentrations were measured in blood samples collected at various timepoints within 48 h. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by non-linear mixed-effects modeling, and the area under the curves (AUCs) for fixed dosing and body size-based dosing were simulated.

resultsThe pharmacokinetics of palonosetron were best described by the three-compartment model, and lean body weight (LBW) was the most significant covariate for all pharmacokinetic parameters. In a patient with LBW of 40 kg, typical clearance and central volume of distribution were 0.102 L/min and 6.98 L, respectively. In simulations, the overall interindividual variability in AUC (0, 48 h) of fixed dosing was not much higher than that of body size-based dosing. In subgroup analysis, the AUCs (0, 48 h) of fixed dosing were considerably lower in the high-weight subgroup and higher in the low-weight subgroup than the median-weight subgroup. In contrast, LBW-based dosing showed similar AUC distributions among the three subgroups.

conclusionLBW-based dosing might be suitable for high-weight patients to avoid possible underdosing. Nevertheless, the current fixed dosing of palonosetron is acceptable for adult patients with normal weight.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAgedAnesthesia, GeneralArea Under CurveBody WeightFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalonosetronPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPalonosetronPalonosetronPharmacokineticsPONV

Identifiers

PMID30976908
OpenAlexW2937731999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.