Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976898›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2020

The determination of real fluid requirements in laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma using minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: a prospectively designed trial.

Martin B Niederle, Edith Fleischmann, Barbara Kabon, Bruno Niederle

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01425710 (Non-invasive Evaluation of Fluid Status and Cardiac Output During Operative Treatment of Pheochromcytoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01425710 completednot on this map

Non-invasive Evaluation of Fluid Status and Cardiac Output During Operative Treatment of Pheochromcytoma

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2011 to 2013Enrolled15ConditionsPheochromocytoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin B NiederleDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. martin.niederle@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-6132
Edith FleischmannDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Barbara KabonDepartment of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care and Pain Management, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Bruno NiederleDivision of General Surgery, Section Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATVienna General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemodynamic instability is frequently observed during adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma (PCC). Guidelines recommend liberal preoperative volume administration. However, it is unclear whether fluid deficiency or vasoplegia causes shifting hemodynamics and whether minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring with esophageal Doppler (EDM) can help visualize intraoperative changes avoiding volume overload and complications.

methodsTen patients with biochemically verified PCC and five patients with hormonally inactive adrenal tumors (HIAT; control group) were treated following a strict protocol. During laparoscopic adrenalectomy, goal-directed fluid therapy was performed using EDM. Hemodynamic and biochemical data were documented. The primary outcome variables were fluid requirement and hemodynamic parameters.

resultsApplying EDM, total intraoperative fluid administration was slightly higher in PCC patients than in patients with HIAT (2100 ± 516 vs. 1550 ± 622 ml, p = 0.097; 12.9 ± 4.8 vs. 8.3 ± 0.7 ml kg

conclusionsAs vasoplegia, but not hypovolemia, was documented after tumor resection, there is no evidence that PCC patients profit from liberal fluid administration during laparoscopic adrenalectomy. To avoid volume overload, noninvasive techniques such as EDM should be routinely used to visualize the variable intraoperative course.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01425710.

Indexed as

AdrenalectomyAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsAdultCase-Control StudiesEsophagusFemaleFluid TherapyHemodynamic MonitoringHemodynamicsHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPerioperative CarePheochromocytomaProspective StudiesAdrenalectomyAdvanced intra-operative monitoringFluid managementHemodynamicsPheochromocytomaPreoperative preparation

Identifiers

PMID30976898
PMCPMC6946750
OpenAlexW2939580202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.