Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976828›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2019

[ADHD screening in alcohol dependent subjects : Psychometric characteristics of ADHD self-report scale and Wender Utah Rating Scale short form].

Mathias Luderer, Nurcihan Kaplan-Wickel, Christian Sick, Agnes Richter, Iris Reinhard, Falk Kiefer, Tillmann Weber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mathias LudererKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Heinrich-Hoffmann-Straße 10, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland. mathias.luderer@kgu.de.
Nurcihan Kaplan-WickelKlinik für Abhängiges Verhalten und Suchtmedizin, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Christian SickKlinik für Abhängiges Verhalten und Suchtmedizin, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Agnes RichterMEDIAN Klinik Wilhelmsheim, Oppenweiler, Deutschland.
Iris ReinhardAbteilung Biostatistik, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Falk KieferKlinik für Abhängiges Verhalten und Suchtmedizin, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Tillmann WeberMEDIAN Klinik Wilhelmsheim, Oppenweiler, Deutschland.
Central Institute of Mental Health · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine screening using self report questionnaires for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in patients with alcohol use disorder is recommended due to its high prevalence and the time-consuming and demanding diagnostic assessment. The psychometric properties of such self-report instruments have hardly been investigated in this patient group.

methodsThe performance of the ADHD self-report scale (ADHD-SR) and the German short form of the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS-k) was determined in 402 patients with alcohol dependence during long-term residential weaning treatment. The diagnosis of adult ADHD had been confirmed in 85 of these patients using an extensive, standardized diagnostic procedure.

resultsThe ADHD-SR at a cut-off ≥15 showed the best psychometric properties (sensitivity 75.3%, specificity 94.0%, positive predictive value, PPV 77.1%, negative predictive value, NPV 93.4%). The results of the WURS-k were unsatisfactory at the established cut-off ≥30 and also at lower cut-offs with more false positive screening results compared to the ADHD-SR. The combination of both instruments (ADHD-SR ≥ 15 and/or WURS-k ≥ 30) increased sensitivity (86.9%) albeit at the expense of a higher rate of false positive screening results (specificity 87.7%, PPV 65.2%).

conclusionThe ADHD-SR is a suitable instrument for routine screening of ADHD in alcohol dependent patients. To improve sensitivity, a lower cut-off (≥15) should be applied. The WURS-k as a single screening instrument cannot be recommended in alcohol dependent patients. If a higher sensitivity is desired, a combination of ADHD-SR and WURS-k is feasible.

Indexed as

AlcoholismAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsSelf ReportUtahAddictionADHDAdultsAlcoholQuestionnaireScreening

Identifiers

PMID30976828
OpenAlexW2936133807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.