Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976811›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2019

Molecular grouping and outcomes of young children with newly diagnosed ependymoma treated on the multi-institutional SJYC07 trial.

Santhosh A Upadhyaya, Giles W Robinson, Arzu Onar-Thomas, Brent A Orr, Catherine A Billups, Daniel C Bowers, Anne E Bendel, Tim Hassall, John R Crawford, Sonia Partap and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A brief history of ependymoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Santhosh A UpadhyayaDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Giles W RobinsonDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Arzu Onar-ThomasDepartment of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Brent A OrrDepartment of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Catherine A BillupsDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Daniel C BowersDepartments of Pediatrics and Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School/Children's Health, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Anne E BendelDepartment of Hematology Oncology, Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Tim HassallDepartment of Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia.
John R CrawfordDepartment of Neurosciences and Pediatrics, University of California San Diego and Rady Childrens Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.
Sonia PartapDepartment of Neurology & Division of Child Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Paul G FisherDepartment of Neurology & Division of Child Neurology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Ruth G TatevossianDepartment of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Tiffany SeahDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, London, UK.
Ibrahim A QaddoumiDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Anna VinitskyDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Gregory T ArmstrongDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Noah D SabinDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Christopher L TinkleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Paul KlimoDepartment of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Danny J IndelicatoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Frederick A BoopDepartment of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Thomas E MerchantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
David W EllisonDepartment of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Amar GajjarDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USStanford University · USChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUChildren’s Minnesota - St. Paul Hospital · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis report documents the clinical characteristics, molecular grouping, and outcome of young children with ependymoma treated prospectively on a clinical trial.

methodsFifty-four children (aged ≤3 y) with newly diagnosed ependymoma were treated on the St Jude Young Children 07 (SJYC07) trial with maximal safe surgical resection, 4 cycles of systemic chemotherapy, consolidation therapy using focal conformal radiation therapy (RT) (5-mm clinical target volume), and 6 months of oral maintenance chemotherapy. Molecular groups were determined by tumor DNA methylation using Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip and profiled on the German Cancer Research Center/Molecular Neuropathology 2.0 classifier.

resultsOne of the 54 study patients had metastases (cerebrospinal fluid positive) at diagnosis. Gross or near-total resection was achieved in 48 (89%) patients prior to RT. At a median follow-up of 4.4 years (range, 0.2-10.3 y), 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 75.1% ± 7.2%, and overall survival was 92.6% ± 4.4%. The molecular groups showed no significant difference in PFS (4-year estimates: posterior fossa ependymoma group A [PF-EPN-A; 42/54], 71.2% ± 8.3%; supratentorial ependymoma positive for v-rel avian reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A [ST-EPN-RELA; 8/54], 83.3% ± 17.0%; and supratentorial ependymoma positive for Yes-associated protein [4/54], 100%, P = 0.22). Subtotal resection prior to RT was associated with an inferior PFS compared with gross or near-total resection (4-year PFS: 41.7% ± 22.5% vs 79.0% ± 7.1%, P = 0.024), as was PF-EPN-A group with 1q gain (P = 0.05). Histopathologic grading was not associated with outcomes (classic vs anaplastic; P = 0.89).

conclusionsIn this prospectively treated cohort of young children with ependymoma, ST-EPN-RELA tumors had a more favorable outcome than reported from retrospective data. Histologic grade did not impact outcome. PF-EPN-A with 1q gain and subtotal resection were associated with inferior outcomes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantChild, PreschoolEpendymomaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeurosurgical ProceduresProgression-Free SurvivalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantTreatment Outcome1q gainchemotherapyclinical target volumeependymoma groups

Identifiers

PMID30976811
PMCPMC6784269
OpenAlexW2936639079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.