ArticleHeliyon2019
Biosorption of hexavalent chromium by
Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative biosorption of hexavalent chromium by Enterobacter sp. Z11 and Bacillus sp. S7: Isotherm, kinetic, and mechanistic insights.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026Article
- Bioprotective role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Biosorption of cesium and strontium from aqueous solution by Aspergillus flavus biomass.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- In Vivo Effectiveness ofMetabolites · 2025Article
- Valorization of natural adsorbents for removing chromium (VI) from industrial wastewater: a review.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
- Modern-Day Green Strategies for the Removal of Chromium from Wastewater.Journal of xenobiotics · 2024Review
- A Comparative Study of Cr(VI) Sorption byPolymers · 2023Article
- Article
- Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) and its microbial reduction.Bioengineered · 2022Review
- Comparative Utilization of Dead and Live Fungal Biomass for the Removal of Heavy Metal: A Concise Review.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The existing techniques for the removal of heavy metals are expensive and frequently inefficient. Thus the application of biosorbents has arisen as an alternative, this being emergent technology that must be studied and explored, with the aim of promoting better environmental and human life quality. The objective of this study was to verify the capacity of active and inactive
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.