ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2019
Diagnostic performance of 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines and inter-observer variability in assigning risk category.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules That Are Not Classifiable by the American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Stratification System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2023Pooled it
- Considerable interobserver variation calls for unambiguous definitions of thyroid nodule ultrasound characteristics.European thyroid journal · 2023Article
- Clinician Agreement on the Classification of Thyroid Nodules Ultrasound Features: A Survey of 2 Endocrine Societies.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Article
- Summary of Meta-analyses of Studies Considering Lesion Size Cut-off Thresholds for The Assessment of Eligibility for FNAB and Sonoelastography and Inter- and Intra-observer Agreement in Estimating the Malignant Potential of Focal Lesions of The Thyroid Gland.Journal of ultrasonography · 2022Article
- Thyroid Nodule Size as a Predictor of Malignancy in Follicular and Hurthle Neoplasms.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- A Preliminary Study of Quantitative Ultrasound for Cancer-Risk Assessment of Thyroid Nodules.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Interobserver variability in quality assessment of magnetic resonance images.BMC medical imaging · 2020Article
- Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model of sonographic signs in predicting thyroid nodules malignancy.European journal of radiology open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the interobserver variability of the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) thyroid guidelines and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the guidelines in detecting thyroid cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsSonographic patterns of 189 thyroid lesions were retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists according to the 2015 guidelines. The risk of malignancy was calculated for each pattern and compared with the published expected risk of malignancy.
resultsThe observed risk of malignancy for very low suspicion, low suspicion, intermediate suspicion and high suspicion patterns were 2%, 12.7%, 26.3% and 29.8% respectively. Interobserver agreement for final category assignment was moderate (κ 0.518).
conclusionThe estimated risk of malignancy in the high suspicion pattern of the 2015 ATA thyroid biopsy guidelines appears to be less than stated. However, this needs further validation in a larger cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.