Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976563›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2019

Review on gender differences in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Konrad Bilski, Łukasz Zapała, Michał A Skrzypczyk, Maciej Oszczudłowski, Jakub Dobruch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The influence of sex hormones on renal cell carcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Clinical and therapeutic implications of sex steroid hormone receptor status in urothelial bladder cancer.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Konrad BilskiDepartment of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Independent Public Hospital of Professor W. Orlowski, Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz ZapałaDepartment of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Independent Public Hospital of Professor W. Orlowski, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał A SkrzypczykDepartment of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Independent Public Hospital of Professor W. Orlowski, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej OszczudłowskiDepartment of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Independent Public Hospital of Professor W. Orlowski, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub DobruchDepartment of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Independent Public Hospital of Professor W. Orlowski, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in the epidemiology, diagnosis and outcomes according to gender in patients diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has been widely reported. In this article we present gender-specific differences in NMIBC in terms of epidemiology, risk factors, first clinical presentation, management and clinical outcomes based on systematically review evidence of existing literature. A literature search of English-language publications that included an analysis of the association of gender differences in patients with NMIBC was performed using PubMed. Sixty-four studies were selected for analysis with consensus of all authors. The incidence and mortality for urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) are higher in men, whereas cancer specific mortality to incidence ratio is significantly lower for men than for women. This phenomenon could be partially explained by differences in exposure to bladder cancer carcinogens. However female gender is associated with higher stage at presentation. Thirteen studies with a total of 11,069 patients diagnosed with NMIBC were included for analysis according to outcomes. In studies that found statistically significant differences in outcomes between sexes, female gender was reported as risk factor for disease recurrence, progression or cancer specific mortality. None of included studies found worse outcomes in men when compared to women with NMIBC. Results of our review suggest that female gender in patients diagnosed with NMIBC is associated-though inconsistently-with higher stage at presentation and poorer outcomes. Numerous factors may influence gender gap in incidence rate, clinical management and reported outcomes. Consensus on comparable data collection in routine practice and prospective trials including clinical outcomes are required to identify gender-specific differences in patients diagnosed with NMIBC.

Indexed as

Bladder cancergendernon-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)

Identifiers

PMID30976563
PMCPMC6414341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.