ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2019
Review on gender differences in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Who is at Risk of Residual Tumor and Pathologic Upstaging at a Second TURBT in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer?Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Investigating gender disparities in urological care for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Metastasis development in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
- The influence of sex hormones on renal cell carcinoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Review
- HER2 Expression in Bladder Cancer: A Focused View on Its Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Role.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an overview of epidemiology, burden, and unmet needs.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Adaptive-mixture-categorization (AMC)-based g-computation and its application to trace element mixtures and bladder cancer risk.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Combining Antiandrogens with Immunotherapy for Bladder Cancer Treatment.European urology open science · 2022Article
- Predictive role of ferroptosis-related long non-coding RNAs in bladder cancer and their association with immune microenvironment and immunotherapy response.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Quality of Life in Female Patients Following Ileal Neobladder and Ileal Conduit: Where Are We?Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Cancer-specific survival by stage of bladder cancer and factors collected by Mallorca Cancer Registry associated to survival.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Clinical and therapeutic implications of sex steroid hormone receptor status in urothelial bladder cancer.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differences in the epidemiology, diagnosis and outcomes according to gender in patients diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has been widely reported. In this article we present gender-specific differences in NMIBC in terms of epidemiology, risk factors, first clinical presentation, management and clinical outcomes based on systematically review evidence of existing literature. A literature search of English-language publications that included an analysis of the association of gender differences in patients with NMIBC was performed using PubMed. Sixty-four studies were selected for analysis with consensus of all authors. The incidence and mortality for urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) are higher in men, whereas cancer specific mortality to incidence ratio is significantly lower for men than for women. This phenomenon could be partially explained by differences in exposure to bladder cancer carcinogens. However female gender is associated with higher stage at presentation. Thirteen studies with a total of 11,069 patients diagnosed with NMIBC were included for analysis according to outcomes. In studies that found statistically significant differences in outcomes between sexes, female gender was reported as risk factor for disease recurrence, progression or cancer specific mortality. None of included studies found worse outcomes in men when compared to women with NMIBC. Results of our review suggest that female gender in patients diagnosed with NMIBC is associated-though inconsistently-with higher stage at presentation and poorer outcomes. Numerous factors may influence gender gap in incidence rate, clinical management and reported outcomes. Consensus on comparable data collection in routine practice and prospective trials including clinical outcomes are required to identify gender-specific differences in patients diagnosed with NMIBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.