Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976550›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2019

Quantitative radiomic model for predicting malignancy of small solid pulmonary nodules detected by low-dose CT screening.

Liting Mao, Huan Chen, Mingzhu Liang, Kunwei Li, Jiebing Gao, Peixin Qin, Xianglian Ding, Xin Li, Xueguo Liu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. A Novel Deep Learning Model to Distinguish Malignant Versus Benign Solid Lung Nodules.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liting MaoDepartment of Radiology, The 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Huan ChenDepartment of Radiology, The 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Mingzhu LiangDepartment of Radiology, The 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Kunwei LiDepartment of Radiology, The 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Jiebing GaoDepartment of Radiology, The 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Peixin QinDepartment of Radiology, The 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Xianglian DingDepartment of Radiology, The 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Xin LiGE Healthcare, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Xueguo LiuDepartment of Radiology, The 5 Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China.
Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is a permanent challenge to differentiate small solid lung nodules. Massive data, extracted from medical image through radiomics analysis, may help early diagnosis of lung cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of a quantitative radiomic model developed from baseline low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for the purpose of predicting malignancy in small solid pulmonary nodules (SSPNs).

methodsThis retrospective study included malignant and benign SSPNs (6 to 15 mm) detected in baseline low-dose CT screening. The malignancy was confirmed pathologically, and benignity was confirmed by long term follow-up or pathological diagnosis. The non-contrast CT images were reconstructed with a lung kernel of a slice thickness of 1 mm and were processed to extract 385 quantitative radiomic features using Analysis-Kinetic software. A predictive model was established with the training set of 156 benign and 40 malignant nodules, and was tested with the validation set of 77 benign and 21 malignant nodules through the analysis of R square. The performance of the radiomic model in predicting malignancy was compared with that of the ACR Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR lung-RADS).

resultsIn 294 cases of SSPNs, 61 lung cancers and 24 benign nodules were confirmed pathologically and the remaining 209 nodules were stable with long-term follow-up (4.1±0.9 years). Eleven non-redundant features, including 8 high-order texture features, were extracted from the training data set. The sensitivity and specificity of the prediction model in malignancy differentiation were 81.0% and 92.2% respectively. The accuracy was superior to ACR-lung RADS (89.8%

conclusionsA radiomic model based on baseline low-dose CT screening for lung cancer can improve the accuracy in predicting malignancy of SSPNs.

Indexed as

CTpredictionRadiomicssolid pulmonary nodules

Identifiers

PMID30976550
PMCPMC6414768
OpenAlexW2915921195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.