Nanofiltration and microfiltration for the removal of chromium, total dissolved solids, and sulfate from water.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Valorization of natural adsorbents for removing chromium (VI) from industrial wastewater: a review.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025
   Review
2. Heavy metal profile with health risk peculiarities in Enugu State and their long-term challenges in drinking water.Journal of water and health · 2024
   Article
3. A review of the treatment technologies for hexavalent chromium contaminated water.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2023
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as