ArticleAcute medicine & surgery2019
Basic life support by citizens in Kawasaki City, Japan - a descriptive epidemiological study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monitor feedback versus instructor feedback for post-pandemic basic life support training: a randomized controlled trial among dental students.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Neurologic outcome and location of cardiac arrest in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A multicentre retrospective cohort in Japan.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo better understand the current status and barriers to making basic life support a common practice among the citizens of Kawasaki City, Japan.
methodWe extracted data according to the Utstein-style guidelines specifically regarding out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) of cardiac etiology. The items were as follows: (i) OHCA witnessed by a citizen, (ii) the victim received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), (iii) an automatic external defibrillator was used by the witness. We compared the rate of each item and the 1-month survival rates with the national average in Japan. We further divided Kawasaki City into three areas and compared each item. We also examined the rate of bystander CPR in each time period and location. Statistical analysis was carried out using the χ
resultsThe 1-month survival rates did not differ significantly from the national average for cases meeting conditions (i)-(iii): (i) 14.0% versus 13.3%, (ii) 19.1% versus 16.4%, (iii) 71.4% versus 53.3%, respectively. However, the rate of condition (i) was significantly lower (47.5% versus 55. 8%,
conclusionsAlthough the 1-month survival rates of OHCAs witnessed by citizens in Kawasaki City did not differ significantly from the national average, the low rate of bystander CPR was notable, especially in the southern and middle areas of the city and when the location was in the home, which implies that basic life support knowledge should be spread to these areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.