Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976435›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery2019

A collaborative educational intervention on procedural sedation and analgesia across the Pacific.

Tatsuya Norii, Nobuhiko Kimura, Yosuke Homma, Hiraku Funakoshi, Cameron Crandall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tatsuya NoriiDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7428-5625
Nobuhiko KimuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center Urayasu-city Chiba Japan.
Yosuke HommaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center Urayasu-city Chiba Japan.
Hiraku FunakoshiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center Urayasu-city Chiba Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-6986
Cameron CrandallDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4459-8409
Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JPUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWorldwide, health-care providers carry out procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in the emergency department. However, training opportunities are limited in many Asian countries, including Japan. We formed an educational group consisting of board-certified emergency physicians in the USA and Japanese physicians and developed a PSA training module. The aims of our study were to demonstrate the effectiveness of training and to describe PSA practice in Japan.

methodsWe undertook a pretest of PSA knowledge questions and a retest immediately after the training intervention. We also carried out a survey and asked about participants' PSA practice. The training module consisted of four didactic hours and three simulation and skills laboratory hours. Results of all pre- and post-intervention knowledge questions were analyzed with McNemar's test, and overall scores were analyzed with a paired

resultsOne hundred and forty-four health-care providers including 123 physicians, 16 nurses, two pharmacists, and three medical students participated in the training. A total of 119 (83%) completed both the pre- and post-intervention knowledge questions. Before the training, participants scored an average 66% (63%-69%) on the written knowledge test. After the intervention, participants showed significant improvement on the knowledge test (improvement 17%; 14%-20%). Among participants who answered the practice survey, 121 (88%) have undertaken PSA. Only 14 (12%) participants always or often use a continuous capnography for PSA. Only 32 (26.4%) participants undertook pre-PSA systematic evaluation.

conclusionOur educational intervention successfully increased participants' knowledge. Only the minority of health-care providers use capnography routinely for PSA, and pre-PSA evaluation is not commonly carried out.

Indexed as

Anesthesiaeducationprocedural sedation and analgesiasafetysimulation

Identifiers

PMID30976435
PMCPMC6442536
OpenAlexW2907221403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.