ArticleClinical kidney journal2019
Wearable artificial kidney and wearable ultrafiltration device vascular access-future directions.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modelling and Experimental Study of Low Flow Rate Miniaturized Electrodialysis for Artificial Kidney Applications.Journal of applied physics · 2026Article
- From Home to Wearable Hemodialysis: Barriers, Progress, and Opportunities.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2024Review
- Digital health and acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 27th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023Review
- Portable, wearable and implantable artificial kidney systems: needs, opportunities and challenges.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023Review
- Wearables in Nephrology: Fanciful Gadgetry or Prêt-à-Porter?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Opportunities in the cloud or pie in the sky? Current status and future perspectives of telemedicine in nephrology.Clinical kidney journal · 2021Review
- Current Status and Future of Artificial Kidney in Humans.Indian journal of nephrologyReview
- The future of the artificial kidney.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince 2005, three human clinical trials have been performed with the Wearable Artificial Kidney (WAK) and Wearable Ultrafiltration (WUF) device. The lack of an adequate vascular access (VA) has been pointed out as the main limitation to their implementation. Based on the current level of understanding, we will make the first conceptual proposal of an adequate VA suitable for the WAK and the WUF.
methodsAll the literature related to WAK and WUF was reviewed. Based on eight main publications the VA major characteristics were defined: a mean blood flow of 100 mL/min; the capability to allow prolonged and frequent dialysis treatments, without interfering in activities of daily living (ADL); safe and convenient connection/disconnection systems; reduced risk of biofilm formation and coagulation; high biocompatibility. A research was done in order to answer to each necessary technological prerequisites.
resultsThe use of a device similar to a CVC with a 5Fr lumen, seems to be the most feasible option. Totally subcutaneous port devices, like the LifeSite(R) or Dialock (R) systems can be a solution to allow WAK or WUF to operate continuously while patients carry out their ADL. Recently, macromolecules that reduce the risk of thrombosis and infection and are integrated into a CVC have been developed and have the capability of overcoming these major limitations.
conclusionWith an adequate VA, portable HD devices can be acceptable options to address several unmet clinical needs of HD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.