Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976326›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2019

Tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance.

Gabriel Paës, David Navarro, Yves Benoit, Senta Blanquet, Brigitte Chabbert, Bernard Chaussepied, Pedro M Coutinho, Sylvie Durand, Igor V Grigoriev, Mireille Haon and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synergistic Co-Inoculation ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  2. Genomic, Proteomic, and Biochemical Study ofJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A time-course analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Hybrid Assembly Improves Genome Quality and Completeness ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriel Paës1FARE Laboratory, INRA, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
David Navarro2INRA, Aix Marseille Univ., UMR1163, BBF, Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Marseille, France.
Yves Benoit4IFP Energies Nouvelles, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Senta Blanquet4IFP Energies Nouvelles, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Brigitte Chabbert1FARE Laboratory, INRA, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Bernard Chaussepied4IFP Energies Nouvelles, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Pedro M Coutinho5CNRS, Aix-Marseille Univ., UMR7857 AFMB, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, Marseille, France.
Sylvie Durand6INRA, UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, Nantes, France.
Igor V Grigoriev7US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA USA.
Mireille Haon2INRA, Aix Marseille Univ., UMR1163, BBF, Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Marseille, France.
Laurent Heux9CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CERMAV, Grenoble, France.
Charlène Launay6INRA, UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, Nantes, France.
Antoine Margeot4IFP Energies Nouvelles, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Yoshiharu Nishiyama9CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CERMAV, Grenoble, France.
Sana Raouche2INRA, Aix Marseille Univ., UMR1163, BBF, Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Marseille, France.
Marie-Noëlle Rosso2INRA, Aix Marseille Univ., UMR1163, BBF, Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Marseille, France.
Estelle Bonnin6INRA, UR1268 Biopolymères Interactions Assemblages, Nantes, France.
Jean-Guy Berrin2INRA, Aix Marseille Univ., UMR1163, BBF, Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7570-3745
Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques · FRIFP Énergies nouvelles · FRBiopolymères Interactions Assemblages · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRFractionnation of AgroResources and Environment · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRLos Alamos National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLignocellulose biomass is known as a recalcitrant material towards enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the process cost in biorefinery. In nature, filamentous fungi naturally degrade lignocellulose, using an arsenal of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes. Assessment of enzyme hydrolysis efficiency generally relies on the yield of glucose for a given biomass. To better understand the markers governing recalcitrance to enzymatic degradation, there is a need to enlarge the set of parameters followed during deconstruction.

resultsIndustrially-pretreated biomass feedstocks from wheat straw, miscanthus and poplar were sequentially hydrolysed following two steps. First, standard secretome from

conclusionsFungal secretomes applied to highly recalcitrant biomass samples can further extend the release of the remaining glucose. The glucose yield can be correlated to chemical and physical markers, which appear to be independent from the biomass type and secretome. Overall, correlations between these markers reveal how nano-scale properties (polymer content and organization) influence macro-scale properties (particle size and water sorption). Further systematic assessment of these markers during enzymatic degradation will foster the development of novel cocktails to unlock the degradation of lignocellulose biomass.

Indexed as

BiomassEnzymatic degradationFilamentous fungiGlucose releaseHydrolysisSaccharificationWater sorption

Identifiers

PMID30976326
PMCPMC6442405
OpenAlexW2935731928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.