ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2019
Comprehensive evaluation of a cost-effective method of culturing
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Greenhouse gas sequestration in poultry farming: Strategies for sustainable production and environmental impact mitigation.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Treatment of non-sterile biogas slurry from a pig farm using microalgae isolated from the activated sludge of sewage plants.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Article
- A Low-Cost Fertilizer Medium Supplemented with Urea for the Lutein Production ofBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effects of C/N ratio on the growth and protein accumulation of heterotrophic Chlorella in broken rice hydrolysate.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022Article
- Simultaneous nutrition removal and high-efficiency biomass and lipid accumulation by microalgae using anaerobic digested effluent from cattle manure combined with municipal wastewater.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe utilization of
resultsThe average biomass productivity of
conclusionThe study provided a comprehensive evaluation of culturing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.