Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976304›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2019

Estimating the relative fitness of escaped farmed salmon offspring in the wild and modelling the consequences of invasion for wild populations.

Emma V A Sylvester, Brendan F Wringe, Steven J Duffy, Lorraine C Hamilton, Ian A Fleming, Marco Castellani, Paul Bentzen, Ian R Bradbury

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma V A SylvesterScience Branch, Fisheries and Oceans Canada St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6030-4327
Brendan F WringeScience Branch, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada Bedford Institute of Oceanography Dartmouth Nova Scotia Canada.
Steven J DuffyScience Branch, Fisheries and Oceans Canada St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador Canada.
Lorraine C HamiltonAquatic Biotechnology Laboratory, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Bedford Institute of Oceanography Dartmouth Nova Scotia Canada.
Ian A FlemingMemorial University of Newfoundland Department of Ocean Sciences St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador Canada.
Marco CastellaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.
Paul BentzenMarine Gene Probe Laboratory, Department of Biology Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.
Ian R BradburyScience Branch, Fisheries and Oceans Canada St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8152-4943
Fisheries and Oceans Canada · CADalhousie University · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout their native range, wild Atlantic salmon populations are threatened by hybridization and introgression with escapees from net-pen salmon aquaculture. Although domestic-wild hybrid offspring have shown reduced fitness in laboratory and field experiments, consequential impacts on population abundance and genetic integrity remain difficult to predict in the field, in part because the strength of selection against domestic offspring is often unknown and context-dependent. Here, we follow a single large escape event of farmed Atlantic salmon in southern Newfoundland and monitor changes in the in-river proportions of hybrids and feral individuals over time using genetically based hybrid identification. Over a three-year period following the escape, the overall proportion of wild parr increased consistently (total wild proportion of 71.6%, 75.1% and 87.5% each year, respectively), with subsequent declines in feral (genetically pure farmed individuals originating from escaped, farmed adults) and hybrid parr. We quantify the strength of selection against parr of aquaculture ancestry and explore the genetic and demographic consequences for populations in the region. Within-cohort changes in the relative proportions of feral and F1 parr suggest reduced relative survival compared to wild individuals over the first (0.15 and 0.81 for feral and F1, respectively) and second years of life (0.26, 0.83). These relative survivorship estimates were used to inform an individual-based salmon eco-genetic model to project changes in adult abundance and overall allele frequency across three invasion scenarios ranging from short-term to long-term invasion and three relative survival scenarios. Modelling results indicate that total population abundance and time to recovery were greatly affected by relative survivorship and predict significant declines in wild population abundance under continued large escape events and calculated survivorship. Overall, this work demonstrates the importance of estimating the strength of selection against domestic offspring in the wild to predict the long-term impact of farmed salmon escape events on wild populations.

Indexed as

aquaculture impactsfish farmingintrogressionpopulation eco‐genetic modellingrelative fitnessSalmo salar

Identifiers

PMID30976304
PMCPMC6439497
OpenAlexW2903265863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.