Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976154›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2017

A Study to Elicit Behavioral Health Patients' and Providers' Opinions on Health Records Consent.

Maria Adela Grando, Anita Murcko, Srividya Mahankali, Michael Saks, Michael Zent, Darwyn Chern, Christy Dye, Richard Sharp, Laura Young, Patricia Davis and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. FHIR Granular Sensitive Data Segmentation.Applied clinical informatics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pilot evaluation of sensitive data segmentation technology for privacy.International journal of medical informatics · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria Adela GrandoArizona State University Department of Biomedical Informatics and Adjunct Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine.
Anita MurckoArizona State University Department of Biomedical Informatics.
Srividya MahankaliBiomedical Informatics Master student, Arizona State University.
Michael SaksLaw and PsychologyArizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law.
Michael ZentTopaz Information Solutions, LLC, Jewish Family and Children's Services Phoenix, and Behavioral Health Information Network of Arizona (BHINAZ).
Darwyn ChernClinical Services and Recovery, LLC.
Christy DyeRecovery, LLC.
Richard SharpMayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Program, the Center for Individualized Medicine Bioethics Program and the Clinical and Translational Research Ethics Program.
Laura YoungBHINAZ.
Patricia DavisBiomedical Informatics Arizona State University.
Megan HiestandBiomedical Informatics undergraduate student at the Arizona State University.
Neda HassanzadehBiomedical Informatics Arizona State University.

Funding

My Data Choices, evaluation of effective consent strategies for patients with behavioral health conditionsR01MH108992 · NIMH · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI GRANDO, MARIA ADELA · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID30976154
PMCPMC6455967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.