ArticleNature protocols2019
Author Correction: Design, execution, and analysis of CRISPR-Cas9-based deletions and genetic interaction networks in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans.
Article in Nature protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Unique Efg1 Fungal Virulence Regulon in the Catheterized Bladder Environment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The version of this paper originally published contained reference errors. The sentence "To dissect complex genetic interactions in C. albicans, a CRISPR-Cas9-based Gene Drive Array (GDA) was developed" incorrectly cited ref. 13, and should have cited ref. 14. In addition, the reference included as ref. 13 in the original paper was incorrect, and should have been the following: Shapiro, R. S., Chavez, A. & Collins, J. J. CRISPR-based genomic tools for the manipulation of genetically intractable microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 333-339 (2018). This reference should have been cited after the sentence "Recent innovations in CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing have facilitated such genetic interaction analyses." The original reference 13 (Gerami-Nejad, M., Zacchi, L. F., McClellan, M., Matter, K. & Berman, J. Shuttle vectors for facile gap repair cloning and integration into a neutral locus in Candida albicans. Microbiology 159, 565-579 (2013)) should have been cited later in the paper, and is now in the reference list as ref. 27. As a result, original references 27-33 have been renumbered in the reference list and in the text. These changes have been made in the PDF and HTML versions of the protocol.
Identifiers
30976123What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.