Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976107›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2019

Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development.

Jessica Vamathevan, Dominic Clark, Paul Czodrowski, Ian Dunham, Edgardo Ferran, George Lee, Bin Li, Anant Madabhushi, Parantu Shah, Michaela Spitzer and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,027 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,027citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,027 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial intelligence catalyzes antimicrobial peptide design.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Drug-likeness prioritised selection identifies anti-Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Drug repurposing in hereditary ataxia.npj drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Target discovery and drug design in the era of artificial intelligence.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

967 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica VamathevanEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK. jessicav@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-9754
Dominic ClarkEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Paul CzodrowskiTechnical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7390-8795
Ian DunhamOpen Targets and European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Edgardo FerranEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK.
George LeeBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Bin LiTakeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Anant MadabhushiCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Parantu ShahEMD Serono R&D Institute, Billerica, MA, USA.
Michaela SpitzerOpen Targets and European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Shanrong ZhaoPfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (QuHbIC) in HPV + Oropharyngeal CarcinomaR01CA220581 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYFMAN, SHLOMO, LEWIS, JAMES · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
RadIO: A Novel Radiomics Toolkit to Predict and Characterize Response to Immunotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung CancerI01BX004121 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI Anant Madabhushi, Charles J Nock · 2019 to 2026
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004121NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220581NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery and development pipelines are long, complex and depend on numerous factors. Machine learning (ML) approaches provide a set of tools that can improve discovery and decision making for well-specified questions with abundant, high-quality data. Opportunities to apply ML occur in all stages of drug discovery. Examples include target validation, identification of prognostic biomarkers and analysis of digital pathology data in clinical trials. Applications have ranged in context and methodology, with some approaches yielding accurate predictions and insights. The challenges of applying ML lie primarily with the lack of interpretability and repeatability of ML-generated results, which may limit their application. In all areas, systematic and comprehensive high-dimensional data still need to be generated. With ongoing efforts to tackle these issues, as well as increasing awareness of the factors needed to validate ML approaches, the application of ML can promote data-driven decision making and has the potential to speed up the process and reduce failure rates in drug discovery and development.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMachine LearningAnimalsDrug DiscoveryHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID30976107
PMCPMC6552674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.