ArticleScientific reports2019
Comparative study of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis on the clinical outcomes in Korea: a population-based approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Mortality of Peritoneal Dialysis versus Hemodialysis in Older Adults: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gerontology · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis.International urology and nephrology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of peritoneal dialysis with hemodialysis on survival of diabetic patients with end-stage kidney disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Renal failure · 2019Pooled it
- Current position of Moncrief and Popovich's technique in patients on peritoneal dialysis: who really benefits from this technique from the perspective of mortality and peritonitis development?Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Article
- Shared decision-making for kidney replacement therapy: a comprehensive review and a proposed model.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical challenges and individualized approaches to dialysis therapy in older adults.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
- Immediate-start peritoneal dialysis without break-in-period: an 18-year retrospective cohort study on patient survival.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2025Article
- Selection of dialysis methods for end-stage kidney disease patients with diabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- Kidney Health Plan 2033 in Korea: bridging the gap between the present and the future.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical impact of catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis on patient survival and catheter-related complications.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2023Article
- Shared Decision Making for Choosing renAl Replacement Therapy in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients (SDM-ART trial): study protocol for randomized clinical trial.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2023Article
- Article
- Who have a better-kidney-related quality of life: peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis patients? A cross sectional study from Saudi Arabia.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
- All-Cause Standardized Mortality Ratio in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Should More Patients with Kidney Failure Bring Treatment Home? What We Have Learned from COVID-19.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality.Kidney international reports · 2022Review
- The role of personal attitudes of control and responsibility for the uptake of peritoneal dialysis- a national survey among dialysis patients.BMC nephrology · 2021Article
- Performance Evaluation and Fouling Propensity of Forward Osmosis (FO) Membrane for Reuse of Spent Dialysate.Membranes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been paucity of data regarding the secular trend of adverse outcomes in peritoneal dialysis (PD) as compared with hemodialysis (HD) in Korea. 96,596 patients who started dialysis between 2004-2015 in Korea were identified using the National Health Insurance Service database. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval, CI) of PD over HD for mortality was 1.31 (1.27-1.36; P < 0.001) in the period of 2004-2007 and 1.21 (1.16-1.27; P < 0.001) in the period of 2008-2011. However, the hazard of PD over HD for mortality turned out to be insignificant in the period of 2012-2015. Similar trend was noted for nonfatal cardiovascular events (CVEs). In subgroup analysis, the hazard of PD over HD for mortality was evident, regardless of the status of age, diabetes, and comorbidity burden in 2004-2011. In 2012-2015, however, the hazard of PD over HD for mortality was insignificant when follow up was censored at one year, which became significant when follow up follow up was censored at three or five year. In conclusion, the mortality of PD over HD in Korea has been significantly improved, a finding that was paralleled by the improved nonfatal CVEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.