Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30976012›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Behavior of mice aboard the International Space Station.

April E Ronca, Eric L Moyer, Yuli Talyansky, Moniece Lowe, Shreejit Padmanabhan, Sungshin Choi, Cynthia Gong, Samuel M Cadena, Louis Stodieck, Ruth K Globus

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Transcriptomic Changes in Mouse Lung Tissue after a Long-Term Space Flight.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Heart-on-a-Chip at the final frontier.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

April E RoncaNASA Ames Research Center, Space Biosciences Division, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA. april.e.ronca@nasa.gov.
Eric L MoyerBlue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, WA, 98154, USA.
Yuli TalyanskyUniversities Space Research Association, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1899-3664
Moniece LoweBlue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, WA, 98154, USA.
Shreejit PadmanabhanSan Jose State University, San Jose, CA, 95192, USA.
Sungshin ChoiKBRwyle, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA.
Cynthia GongKBRwyle, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA.
Samuel M CadenaNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Louis StodieckBioServe Space Technologies, Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80302, USA.
Ruth K GlobusNASA Ames Research Center, Space Biosciences Division, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in space habitation has grown dramatically with planning underway for the first human transit to Mars. Despite a robust history of domestic and international spaceflight research, understanding behavioral adaptation to the space environment for extended durations is scant. Here we report the first detailed behavioral analysis of mice flown in the NASA Rodent Habitat on the International Space Station (ISS). Following 4-day transit from Earth to ISS, video images were acquired on orbit from 16- and 32-week-old female mice. Spaceflown mice engaged in a full range of species-typical behaviors. Physical activity was greater in younger flight mice as compared to identically-housed ground controls, and followed the circadian cycle. Within 7-10 days after launch, younger (but not older), mice began to exhibit distinctive circling or 'race-tracking' behavior that evolved into coordinated group activity. Organized group circling behavior unique to spaceflight may represent stereotyped motor behavior, rewarding effects of physical exercise, or vestibular sensation produced via self-motion. Affording mice the opportunity to grab and run in the RH resembles physical activities that the crew participate in routinely. Our approach yields a useful analog for better understanding human responses to spaceflight, providing the opportunity to assess how physical movement influences responses to microgravity.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutSpace FlightWeightlessness

Identifiers

PMID30976012
PMCPMC6459880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.