Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30975669›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Patient factors driving overuse of cardiac catheterisation: a qualitative study with 25 participants from two German teaching practices.

Anna Herwig, Dorothea Dehnen, Birgitta Weltermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna HerwigInstitute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dorothea DehnenInstitute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Birgitta WeltermannInstitute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPercutaneous coronary interventions do not provide a benefit over medical therapy for stable patients. However, an overuse of cardiac catheterisation (CC) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is documented in Germany and other countries. In this study, we aim to understand patient factors that foster this overuse.

designOur study is an exploratory qualitative interview study with narrative, structured interviews. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis by Mayring.

settingThe interviews were conducted in two German teaching practices.

participants24 interviews with 25 patients were conducted; 17 (68%) patients were male, the average age was 73.9 years (range 53-88 years). All patients suffered from CAD and had undergone at least one CC. Patients with known anxiety disorders were excluded from the study.

resultsThe analysis identified six patient factors which contributed to or prevented the overuse of CC: (1) unquestioned acceptance of prescheduled appointments for procedures/convenience; (2) disinterest in and/or lack of disease-specific knowledge; (3) helplessness in situations with varying opinions on the required care; (4) fear of another cardiac event, (5) patient-physician relationship and (6) the patient's experience that repeat interventions did not result in a change of health status or care.

conclusionsConducted in a country with documented overuse of CC, we showed that most patients trusted their physicians' recommendations for repeat coronary angiographies even if they were asymptomatic. Strategies to align physician adherence with guidelines and corresponding patient information are needed to prevent overuse.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedical OverusePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedAged, 80 and overCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleGermanyGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle Agedcoronary heart diseasecoronary interventionoverusepatient factorsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30975669
PMCPMC6500255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.