Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2019
Erlotinib plus bevacizumab versus erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NEJ026): interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 374 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-center, One-arm, Phase II Trial of Anlotinib Combined With Osimertinib as the Second-line Treatment in Stage IIIb-IV NSCLC With Confirmed EGFRm and T790M.
Almonertinib Combined With Bevacizumab for EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients With Leptomeningeal Metastasis: A Prospective, Open-label, Multi-center, Single-arm Study
An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase I/IIB Study of Dacomitinib Plus Anlotinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) 21-L858R Mutations.
Who cites it
374 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 630 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line EGFR-TKI-based combination strategies for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC in diverse clinicopathological subgroups: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- What is the best first-line combination regimen for advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis and systemic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- What is the optimal first-line regimen for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Guideline
- First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Combination of pemetrexed with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Management of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Brain Metastases, and Actionable Genomic Alterations: A Systematic Literature Review.Advances in therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in combination with angiogenesis inhibitors as first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic agents or chemotherapy plus EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Addition of bevacizumab to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in Asian populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of the bevacizumab and erlotinib combinationFrontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- An Observational Study of Afatinib 30 mg Daily in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Common EGFR Mutations Treated With Afatinib.Thoracic cancer · 2026Trial
- First-line Aumolertinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus apatinib (VEGFR inhibitor) versus aumolertinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients: a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib Plus Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment for Advanced NSCLC Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations: A Multicenter, Phase II Trial.Thoracic cancer · 2025Trial
314 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResistance to first-generation or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy develops in almost half of patients with EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after 1 year of treatment. The JO25567 phase 2 trial comparing erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy with erlotinib monotherapy established the activity and manageable toxicity of erlotinib plus bevacizumab in patients with NSCLC. We did a phase 3 trial to validate the results of the JO25567 study and report here the results from the preplanned interim analysis.
methodsIn this prespecified interim analysis of the randomised, open-label, phase 3 NEJ026 trial, we recruited patients with stage IIIB-IV disease or recurrent, cytologically or histologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC with activating EGFR genomic aberrations from 69 centres across Japan. Eligible patients were at least 20 years old, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, no previous chemotherapy for advanced disease, and one or more measurable lesions based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (1.1). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg per day plus intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg once every 21 days, or erlotinib 150 mg per day monotherapy. Randomisation was done by minimisation, stratified by sex, smoking status, clinical stage, and EGFR mutation subtype. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. This study is ongoing; the data cutoff for this prespecified interim analysis was Sept 21, 2017. Efficacy was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of treatment and had at least one response evaluation. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000017069.
findingsBetween June 3, 2015, and Aug 31, 2016, 228 patients were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab (n=114) or erlotinib alone (n=114). 112 patients in each group were evaluable for efficacy, and safety was evaluated in 112 patients in the combination therapy group and 114 in the monotherapy group. Median follow-up was 12·4 months (IQR 7·0-15·7). At the time of interim analysis, median progression-free survival for patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group was 16·9 months (95% CI 14·2-21·0) compared with 13·3 months (11·1-15·3) for patients in the erlotinib group (hazard ratio 0·605, 95% CI 0·417-0·877; p=0·016). 98 (88%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and 53 (46%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was rash (23 [21%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group vs 24 [21%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). Nine (8%) of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and five (4%) of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group had serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse events were grade 4 neutropenia (two [2%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group) and grade 4 hepatic dysfunction (one [1%] of 112 patients in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group and one [1%] of 114 patients in the erlotinib alone group). No treatment-related deaths occurred.
interpretationThe results of this interim analysis showed that bevacizumab plus erlotinib combination therapy improves progression-free survival compared with erlotinib alone in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC. Future studies with longer follow-up, and overall survival and quality-of-life data will be required to further assess the efficacy of this combination in this setting.
fundingChugai Pharmaceutical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.