Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30975543›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2019

Unmasking a new prognostic marker and therapeutic target from the GDNF-RET/PIT1/p14ARF/p53 pathway in acromegaly.

Miguel Chenlo, Iria A Rodriguez-Gomez, Ramon Serramito, Angela R Garcia-Rendueles, Rocío Villar-Taibo, Eva Fernandez-Rodriguez, Sihara Perez-Romero, Maria Suarez-Fariña, Alfredo Garcia-Allut, Jose M Cabezas-Agricola and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Current controversies in acromegaly care.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Transcriptome-Derived Ligand-Receptor Interactome of Major PitNET Subgroups.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Miguel ChenloNeoplasia & Endocrine Differentiation P0L5, Centro de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS), University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Iria A Rodriguez-GomezServicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (CHUS)-SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital HM Modelo, A Coruña, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ramon SerramitoServicio de Neurocirugía, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (CHUS)-SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Angela R Garcia-RenduelesNeoplasia & Endocrine Differentiation P0L5, Centro de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS), University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Rocío Villar-TaiboServicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (CHUS)-SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Eva Fernandez-RodriguezServicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Spain.
Sihara Perez-RomeroNeoplasia & Endocrine Differentiation P0L5, Centro de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS), University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Maria Suarez-FariñaNeoplasia & Endocrine Differentiation P0L5, Centro de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS), University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Alfredo Garcia-AllutServicio de Neurocirugía, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (CHUS)-SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Jose M Cabezas-AgricolaServicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (CHUS)-SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Javier Rodriguez-GarciaServicio de Análisis Clínicos, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (CHUS)-SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Pamela V LearDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rosa M Alvarez-San MartinServicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Leon, Spain.
Cristina Alvarez-EscolaServicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio BernabeuServicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela (CHUS)-SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Electronic address: ignacio.bernabeu.moron@sergas.es.
Clara V AlvarezNeoplasia & Endocrine Differentiation P0L5, Centro de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS), University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Electronic address: clara.alvarez@usc.es.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESComplejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Ourense · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcromegaly is produced by excess growth hormone secreted by a pituitary adenoma of somatotroph cells (ACRO). First-line therapy, surgery and adjuvant therapy with somatostatin analogs, fails in 25% of patients. There is no predictive factor of resistance to therapy. New therapies are investigated using few dispersed tumor cells in acute primary cultures in standard conditions where the cells do not grow, or using rat pituitary cell lines that do not maintain the full somatotroph phenotype. The RET/PIT1/p14ARF/p53 pathway regulates apoptosis in normal pituitary somatotrophs whereas the RET/GDNF pathway regulates survival, controlling PIT1 levels and blocking p14ARF (ARF) and p53 expression.

methodsWe investigated these two RET pathways in a prospective series of 32 ACRO and 63 non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA), studying quantitative RNA and protein gene expression for molecular-clinical correlations and how the RET pathway might be implicated in therapeutic success. Clinical data was collected during post-surgical follow-up. We also established new'humanized' pituitary cultures, allowing 20 repeated passages and maintaining the pituitary secretory phenotype, and tested five multikinase inhibitors (TKI: Vandetanib, Lenvatinib, Sunitinib, Cabozantinib and Sorafenib) potentially able to act on the GDNF-induced RET dimerization/survival pathway. Antibody arrays investigated intracellular molecular pathways.

findingsIn ACRO, there was specific enrichment of all genes in both RET pathways, especially GDNF. ARF and GFRA4 gene expression were found to be opposing predictors of response to first-line therapy. ARF cut-off levels, calculated categorizing by GNAS mutation, were predictive of good response (above) or resistance (below) to therapy months later. Sorafenib, through AMPK, blocked the GDNF/AKT survival action without altering the RET apoptotic pathway.

interpretationTumor ARF mRNA expression measured at the time of the surgery is a prognosis factor in acromegaly. The RET inhibitor, Sorafenib, is proposed as a potential treatment for resistant ACRO. FUND: This project was supported by national grants from Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and Instituto Investigación Carlos III, with participation of European FEDER funds, to IB (PI150056) and CVA (BFU2016-76973-R). It was also supported initially by a grant from the Investigator Initiated Research (IIR) Program (WI177773) and by a non-restricted Research Grant from Pfizer Foundation to IB. Some of the pituitary acromegaly samples were collected in the framework of the Spanish National Registry of Acromegaly (REMAH), partially supported by an unrestricted grant from Novartis to the Spanish Endocrine Association (SEEN). CVA is also supported from a grant of Medical Research Council UK MR/M018539/1.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAnimalsApoptosisBiomarkersCombined Modality TherapyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorHumansImmunohistochemistryModels, BiologicalMutationPituitary NeoplasmsPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRatsBiomarkersGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorPOU1F1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, humanTranscription Factor Pit-1Tumor Suppressor Protein p14ARFTumor Suppressor Protein p53AcromegalyARFEndoscopy surgeryGFRA4Human pituitary culturesPituitary tumorsSomatotropinomasSorafenibSSA-resistance

Identifiers

PMID30975543
PMCPMC6562173
OpenAlexW2938959916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.