ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2019
Screening and Management of Depression in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
175 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Depression and cardiovascular disease: mind the gap in the guidelines.European heart journal · 2025Pooled it
- Cardiovascular diseases and depression: A meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Psychic and Cognitive Impacts of Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence from an Observational Study and Comparison by a Systematic Literature Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Exercise type and settings, quality of life, and mental health in coronary artery disease: a network meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing suicide risk in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and metanalysis of randomized control trials.Heart failure reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Cardiovascular adverse reactions associated with escitalopram in patients with underlying cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical practice guideline of the Interamerican Society of Cardiology on primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2022Guideline
- Major Cardiac-Psychiatric Drug-Drug Interactions: a Systematic Review of the Consistency of Drug Databases.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of Exercise Therapy on Anxiety and Depression in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of antidepressants on death in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review of cardiac rehabilitation guidelines: Quality and scope.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2020Pooled it
- Resilience and Depressive Symptoms in Adults With Cardiac Disease: A Systematic Review.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingPooled it
- Analysis of the impact of dexmedetomidine on the vital signs of patients with anxiety at various time intervals upon entering the operating room.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Depression and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Black Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Efficacy of Mobile-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Lowering Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Guanxin Danshen Dripping Pills Improve Quality of Life and Cardiovascular Prognoses of CHD Patients after PCI with Anxiety or Depression (GLAD Study): A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2023Trial
- Depression Subtypes in Systolic Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison PsychiatryTrial
- Cardiovascular health and depression among postpartum women in the United States.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Biopsychosocial phenogroups in an urban population with coronary artery disease and their associations with adverse cardiovascular events.European heart journal open · 2026Article
115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Depression is a common problem in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is associated with increased mortality, excess disability, greater health care expenditures, and reduced quality of life. Depression is present in 1 of 5 patients with coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, and heart failure. Depression complicates the optimal management of CVD by worsening cardiovascular risk factors and decreasing adherence to healthy lifestyles and evidence-based medical therapies. As such, standardized screening pathways for depression in patients with CVD offer the potential for early identification and optimal management of depression to improve health outcomes. Unfortunately, the burden of depression in patients with CVD is under-recognized; as a result, screening and management strategies targeting depression have been poorly implemented in patients with CVD. In this review, the authors discuss a practical approach for the screening and management of depression in patients with CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.