Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30975184›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2019

Maize synthesized benzoxazinoids affect the host associated microbiome.

Enoch Narh Kudjordjie, Rumakanta Sapkota, Stine K Steffensen, Inge S Fomsgaard, Mogens Nicolaisen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
43.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 300 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel CRISPR/Cas9-DerivedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Continuous cropping of lavender (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enoch Narh KudjordjieFaculty of Science and Technology, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Forsøgsvej 1, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark.
Rumakanta SapkotaFaculty of Science and Technology, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Forsøgsvej 1, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark.
Stine K SteffensenFaculty of Science and Technology, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Forsøgsvej 1, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark.
Inge S FomsgaardFaculty of Science and Technology, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Forsøgsvej 1, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark.
Mogens NicolaisenFaculty of Science and Technology, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Forsøgsvej 1, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark. mn@agro.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-0407-2488
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlants actively shape their associated microbial communities by synthesizing bio-active substances. Plant secondary metabolites are known for their signaling and plant defense functions, yet little is known about their overall effect on the plant microbiome. In this work, we studied the effects of benzoxazinoids (BXs), a group of secondary metabolites present in maize, on the host-associated microbial structure. Using BX knock-out mutants and their W22 parental lines, we employed 16S and ITS2 rRNA gene amplicon analysis to characterize the maize microbiome at early growth stages.

resultsRhizo-box experiment showed that BXs affected microbial communities not only in roots and shoots, but also in the rhizosphere. Fungal richness in roots was more affected by BXs than root bacterial richness. Maize genotype (BX mutants and their parental lines) as well as plant age explained both fungal and bacterial community structure. Genotypic effect on microbial communities was stronger in roots than in rhizosphere. Diverse, but specific, microbial taxa were affected by BX in both roots and shoots, for instance, many plant pathogens were negatively correlated to BX content. In addition, a co-occurrence analysis of the root microbiome revealed that BXs affected specific groups of the microbiome.

conclusionsThis study provides insights into the role of BXs for microbial community assembly in the rhizosphere and in roots and shoots. Coupling the quantification of BX metabolites with bacterial and fungal communities, we were able to suggest a gatekeeper role of BX by showing its correlation with specific microbial taxa and thus providing insights into effects on specific fungal and bacterial taxa in maize roots and shoots. Root microbial co-occurrence networks revealed that BXs affect specific microbial clusters.

Indexed as

Host Microbial InteractionsMicrobiotaRhizosphereBacteriaBenzoxazinesFungiPlant RootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSecondary MetabolismSoil MicrobiologyZea maysBenzoxazinesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBenzoxazinoidsKnockout mutantsMaize microbiomePlant microbiomeRoot exudatesSecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID30975184
PMCPMC6460791
OpenAlexW2946596447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.