Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30975180›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2019

Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with in vitro endothelial hyperpermeability and increased angiopoietin-2 levels.

Nicole A M Dekker, Anoek L I van Leeuwen, Willem W J van Strien, Jisca Majolée, Robert Szulcek, Alexander B A Vonk, Peter L Hordijk, Christa Boer, Charissa E van den Brom

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A hitchhiker's guide through the COVID-19 galaxy.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole A M DekkerAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.dekker@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0300-3026
Anoek L I van LeeuwenAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Willem W J van StrienAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jisca MajoléeAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Physiology, Experimental Laboratory for Vital Signs, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert SzulcekAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Physiology, Experimental Laboratory for Vital Signs, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander B A VonkAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Physiology, Experimental Laboratory for Vital Signs, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter L HordijkAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Physiology, Experimental Laboratory for Vital Signs, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Christa BoerAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charissa E van den BromAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

Dutch Society of Anesthesiology Young Investigator Grant 2017European Society of Anaesthesiology Research Project Grant 2016European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Levi-Montalcini Award 2017Hartstichting 2016T064Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative Grant Grant number 2012-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndothelial hyperpermeability following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) contributes to microcirculatory perfusion disturbances and postoperative complications after cardiac surgery. We investigated the postoperative course of renal and pulmonary endothelial barrier function and the association with microcirculatory perfusion and angiopoietin-2 levels in patients after CPB.

methodsClinical data, sublingual microcirculatory data, and plasma samples were collected from patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with CPB (n = 17) before and at several time points up to 72 h after CPB. Renal and pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells were incubated with patient plasma, and in vitro endothelial barrier function was assessed using electric cell-substrate impedance sensing. Plasma levels of angiopoietin-1,-2, and soluble Tie2 were measured, and the association with in vitro endothelial barrier function and in vivo microcirculatory perfusion was determined.

resultsA plasma-induced reduction of renal and pulmonary endothelial barrier function was observed in all samples taken within the first three postoperative days (P < 0.001 for all time points vs. pre-CPB). Angiopoietin-2 and soluble Tie2 levels increased within 72 h after CPB (5.7 ± 4.4 vs. 1.7 ± 0.4 ng/ml, P < 0.0001; 16.3 ± 4.7 vs. 11.9 ± 1.9 ng/ml, P = 0.018, vs. pre-CPB), whereas angiopoietin-1 remained stable. Interestingly, reduced in vitro renal and pulmonary endothelial barrier moderately correlated with reduced in vivo microcirculatory perfusion after CPB (r = 0.47, P = 0.005; r = 0.79, P < 0.001). In addition, increased angiopoietin-2 levels moderately correlated with reduced in vitro renal and pulmonary endothelial barrier (r = - 0.46, P < 0.001; r = - 0.40, P = 0.005) and reduced in vivo microcirculatory perfusion (r = - 0.43, P = 0.01; r = - 0.41, P = 0.03).

conclusionsCPB is associated with an impairment of in vitro endothelial barrier function that continues in the first postoperative days and correlates with reduced postoperative microcirculatory perfusion and increased circulating angiopoietin-2 levels. These results suggest that angiopoietin-2 is a biomarker for postoperative endothelial hyperpermeability, which may contribute to delayed recovery of microcirculatory perfusion after CPB.

trial registrationNTR4212 .

Indexed as

AgedAngiopoietin-1Angiopoietin-2BiomarkersCardiopulmonary BypassEndothelial CellsFemaleHumansKidneyLungMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedReceptor, TIE-2Angiopoietin-1Angiopoietin-2ANGPT1 protein, humanBiomarkersReceptor, TIE-2TEK protein, humanAngiopoietin-2Capillary permeabilityCardiopulmonary bypassEndotheliumMicrocirculation

Identifiers

PMID30975180
PMCPMC6460737
OpenAlexW2946707465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.