Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30975175›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2019

A high-performance approach for predicting donor splice sites based on short window size and imbalanced large samples.

Ying Zeng, Hongjie Yuan, Zheming Yuan, Yuan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying ZengHunan Engineering & Technology Research Center for Agricultural Big Data Analysis & Decision-making, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Hongjie YuanHunan Engineering & Technology Research Center for Agricultural Big Data Analysis & Decision-making, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China.
Zheming YuanHunan Engineering & Technology Research Center for Agricultural Big Data Analysis & Decision-making, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China. zhmyuan@sina.com.
Yuan ChenHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, Hunan, China. 184192759@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSplice sites prediction has been a long-standing problem in bioinformatics. Although many computational approaches developed for splice site prediction have achieved satisfactory accuracy, further improvement in predictive accuracy is significant, for it is contributing to predict gene structure more accurately. Determining a proper window size before prediction is necessary. Overly long window size may introduce some irrelevant features, which would reduce predictive accuracy, while the use of short window size with maximum information may performs better in terms of predictive accuracy and time cost. Furthermore, the number of false splice sites following the GT-AG rule far exceeds that of true splice sites, accurate and rapid prediction of splice sites using imbalanced large samples has always been a challenge. Therefore, based on the short window size and imbalanced large samples, we developed a new computational method named chi-square decision table (χ

resultsUsing a short window size of 11 bp, χ

conclusionsBased on short window size and imbalanced large samples, the proposed method not only achieves higher predictive accuracy than some existing methods, but also has high computational speed and good robustness against nucleotide insertions and deletions. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Ryan McGinty, Ph.D. and Dirk Walther.

Indexed as

RNA Splice SitesChi-Square DistributionComputational BiologyRNA Splice SitesBalanced decision tableChi-square testDonor splice siteShort window sizeχ2-DT

Identifiers

PMID30975175
PMCPMC6460831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.