Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30975098›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Human rabies post exposure prophylaxis at the Pasteur Institute of Dakar, Senegal: trends and risk factors.

Mamadou Korka Diallo, Alpha Oumar Diallo, Anta Dicko, Vincent Richard, Emmanuelle Espié

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Unveiling the Hidden Regulators: The Impact of lncRNAs on Zoonoses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rabies in the Tropics.Current tropical medicine reports · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mamadou Korka DialloPasteur Institute of Dakar, Centre for human rabies post exposition prophylaxis, Dakar, Senegal.
Alpha Oumar DialloPasteur Institute of Dakar, Epidemiology unit, Dakar, Senegal.
Anta DickoPasteur Institute of Dakar, Centre for human rabies post exposition prophylaxis, Dakar, Senegal.
Vincent RichardPasteur Institute of Dakar, Epidemiology unit, Dakar, Senegal.
Emmanuelle EspiéPasteur Institute of Dakar, Epidemiology unit, Dakar, Senegal. emmanuelle.espie@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-7880
Institut Pasteur de Dakar · SNUniversité Gaston Berger · SN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRabies remains a major public health problem in developing countries. Most fatal rabies cases, especially in children, result from dog bites and occur in low-income countries, such as those in Sub-Saharan Africa. Rabies can be controlled through mass dog vaccination and human deaths prevented through timely and appropriate post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). As access to appropriate PEP remains a serious challenge for bite-victims, the aim of this study was to understand the use of PEP, to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices with respect to rabies and to identify risk factors related to non-compliance with PEP to define recommendations for improving PEP in Senegal.

methodsThis study included patients with suspicion of rabies exposure who sought PEP at the Pasteur Institute of Dakar from April 2013 to March 2014. Patients with rabies clinical symptoms, those who had already started PEP and those with exposure outside Senegal or for more than 3 months were excluded. Data on risk factors and propensity to seek and complete PEP were collected using questionnaires and phone interviews. The association between acceptability and compliance with PEP and other independent variables were evaluated using multivariate regression analysis.

resultsAmong the 905 patients enrolled into the study, 67% were male (sex ratio M/F, 2) and 46%, children under 15 years of age. Exposures by animal bites represented 87%, whereas the remainder were due to scratches or contact; 76% were classified as WHO category III and 88% were due to dogs. Among these patients, 7% refused to start PEP and 54.5% completed the full schedule. Main factors reported by non-compliant patients were vaccine costs and affordability, and knowledge on status of biting animal.

conclusionThis study shows that despite the awareness about rabies dangers and prevention, only half of the patients completed the full PEP schedule. The following recommendations, such as free of charge prophylaxis or intradermal regimens as an alternative to intramuscular regimens, should be considered to increase the adherence to PEP at the Pasteur Institute of Dakar and in Senegal.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePost-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsBites and StingsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCosts and Cost AnalysisDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfantRabies VaccinesDog bitesKnowledgePost exposure prophylaxisRabiesRisk factorsSub-saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID30975098
PMCPMC6460513
OpenAlexW2944521799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.